Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 266 examens experts du AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus et l'estimation moyenne est 79%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
July 2015
(79%)
266 Avis
Note moyenne issue des avis d’experts sur ce produit.
Utilisateurs
(93%)
2719 Avis
Note moyenne délivrée par les utilisateurs du produit.
790100266
Les éditeurs ont aimé
Progression de performances
Baisse de la consommation
OC
Prix
Performances dans les applications tirant parti de la présence de plusieurs cœurs
Fonction Turbo qui permet de limiter la casse sur les applications ne tirant pas parti de la présence de plusieurs cœurs
Les cartes mères AM+ d'ancienne génération sont co
Coefficient multiplicateur débloqué
Caractéristiques techniques
Ratio perfs/prix intéressant
Les éditeurs n'ont pas aimé
Pas toujours au Top
Conso encore importante
Consommation électrique
Performances dans les applications ne tirant pas parti de la présence de plusieurs cœurs
Performances dans les jeux vidéo toujours en retrait par rapport à la concurrence
This is one of those occasions where AMD has done their job well, but we can’t really celebrate quite yet. The new flagship AMD FX-8350 “Vishera” definitively takes the title of champion amongst AMD processors. The Phenom II 1100T 6-core CPU can’t even...
Publié: 2012-10-22, Auteur: Victor , review by: Bjorn3d.com
Piledriver is what Bulldozer should have been in the first place. The FX-8350 puts AMD back on track, but not yet back in the game. If it were not for Intel's exceptional high IPC and performance per watts ratio on Sandy Bridge/Ivy Bridge, AMD's Vishera/P...
Publié: 2012-10-22, Auteur: Scott , review by: Techreport.com
You've probably gathered that the FX-8350 improves on its Bulldozer-based precursor pretty handily for a chip that's neither a die shrink nor an all-new architecture. The final verdict on the FX-8350 isn't terribly difficult to render, but it does have s...
While AMD is trying to make a value statement with its new FX-8350 (selling for $219 at time of publication), it simply will not be able to do so in the enthusiast arena. Perhaps, if we find that the $169 FX-8320 turns out to be a healthy overclocker, it...
The AMD FX-8350 has a number of strong points that make it a great choice for your computer. If you're looking to upgrade from an older system you really can't beat the price to performance ratio offered with an eight core 4GHz processor processor fo...
Back then, a year ago, when we first met the desktop Zambezi processors, it already felt like AMD Bulldozer didn’t really end up in a good spot. We can’t say that AMD’s microarchitecture is flawed. On the contrary, it is very interesting and is capabl...
We ran her through the twisties. We did the drag racing. We measured her mileage. We even popped her hood to figure out what makes this little speedster tick. In every way, today's FX-8350 is better than the FX-8150 that preceded it. Faster. More efficien...
Excellent affordability versus computing power, Low platform price, NEW Piledriver CPU core design, Improved "Per Clock" performance, Compatible with existing AM3+ products
Same maximum TDP as previous products, Perhaps a bit late to the market. It still uses 32nm while Intel is on 22nm, Higher power consumption than Intel products, "Low" but adequate single-threaded performance will not appeal to some
What can I say? AMD has priced these new FX-8350 CPUs in such a way that there is no doubt: they make an attractive alternative to their Intel counterparts, and AMD seems focused on keeping that price difference no matter what. AMD can't take Intel ove...
AMD FX 8350 may not be the most powerful option on the market, or have the latest technology, but the raw performance is still ample for most gaming needs...
