Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 266 examens experts du AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus et l'estimation moyenne est 79%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
July 2015
(79%)
266 Avis
Note moyenne issue des avis d’experts sur ce produit.
Utilisateurs
(93%)
2719 Avis
Note moyenne délivrée par les utilisateurs du produit.
790100266
Les éditeurs ont aimé
Progression de performances
Baisse de la consommation
OC
Prix
Performances dans les applications tirant parti de la présence de plusieurs cœurs
Fonction Turbo qui permet de limiter la casse sur les applications ne tirant pas parti de la présence de plusieurs cœurs
Les cartes mères AM+ d'ancienne génération sont co
Coefficient multiplicateur débloqué
Caractéristiques techniques
Ratio perfs/prix intéressant
Les éditeurs n'ont pas aimé
Pas toujours au Top
Conso encore importante
Consommation électrique
Performances dans les applications ne tirant pas parti de la présence de plusieurs cœurs
Performances dans les jeux vidéo toujours en retrait par rapport à la concurrence
Publié: 2014-05-13, Auteur: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Competition is a good thing and without it, we all lose out. Unfortunately, Intel isn't facing much in the way of competition in the desktop CPU market right now, and they haven't for some time. AMD's year and a half old Piledriver-based FX processors can...
By the end of this review, all i have to say is that AMD now has a product that is competitive against Intel processors in terms of value. Intel Core i5 series are aimed by budget PC builders and gamers since they offer about the same performance minus th...
Extrait: Review AMD Trinity and FX Desktop Processors Klaus Hinum, Till Schönborn ( translated by Martina Osztovits), 05/07/2013 Windows Ivy Bridge Gaming Desktop roundup. Notebookcheck leaves the beaten track: We compare current PC process...
Extrait: Now that Piledriver-based CPUs and APUs are widely available (and the FX-8350 is selling for less than $200), it's a great time to compare value-oriented chips in our favorite titles. We're also breaking out a test that conveys the latency between frames....
Our hero should have been released a year ago, named "FX-8150." Like any worthy debut processor of a new microarchitecture, it outperforms Phenom II X6 1100T and scores on a par with (sometimes even better than) the top Core i5 CPUs of the 2nd generat...
The AMD LCS that they are offering with the older FX-8150, and supposedly will be offering with the newer FX-8350, is a really nice little unit which will improve overclocking and thermal performance as compared to even a high end forced air unit.I was ab...
Extrait: AMD FX-8350 - Transistor polishing We have to admit that the first encounter with Bulldozer was a bit disappointing, whether we’re talking about our own or the general impression. Simply enough, AMD’s octa-core CPU was expected to deliver a lot, yet it...
Extrait: The launch of Socket AM3+ processors with Piledriver microarchitecture inspired many AMD fans. However, until recently we only based our opinion on the results obtained from the top model in the new AMD FX family. Today we are going to make up for this omission and carry out a detailed performance analysis of all Vishera processors with eight, six and four cores....
Cet avis était-il utile?
-
Publié: 2012-11-30, Auteur: Joel , review by: pcmag.com
Improved performance and power consumption over previous generation products.
Still lags Intel in important areas like gaming
The AMD FX-8350 CPU improves company's standing against Intel but doesn't rewrite the rules of the game....
So, what have we learned? Objectively, when looking at our entire benchmarking and gaming suite, the FX-8350 is priced right where it should be. Let's start with a reminder of price. As configured, the two systems here are $220 apart, or 16.7%. As menti...
