Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 224 examens experts du AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus et l'estimation moyenne est 67%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
(67%)
224 Avis
Note moyenne issue des avis d’experts sur ce produit.
Utilisateurs
-
0 Avis
Note moyenne délivrée par les utilisateurs du produit.
670100224
Les éditeurs ont aimé
Gravure 32nm
Clarté de l'offre
Modèle débloqué
Aptitudes en overclocking
Performances dans les applications tirant parti de la présence de plusieurs coeurs
Mode Turbo à deux paliers
Les éditeurs n'ont pas aimé
Performances pas au niveau
Positionnement tarifaire à revoir
Consommation/échauffement
Consommation électrique
Les performances devraient être plus élevées par rapport à l'ancienne génération et à la concurrence
Whether or not we're correct about Bulldozer really being a server and workstation CPU, it's terribly unsuited to the kinds of software we're currently using on consumer PCs. This software is still heavily reliant on single-thread performance, and the FX-...
It is extremely refreshing to see a new architecture from AMD after such a long time without one. Bulldozer is the world's first eight-core consumer CPU, and is marketed towards the consumer and enthusiast gaming crowd. The new chip does have many att...
What we wanted out of Bulldozer and AMD and what we are getting are two different things. AMD has built a very good processor in Bulldozer that can be had at a very good price. Bulldozer however is just some "Me too!" when comparing to Intel's $200 2500K...
Please keep in mind our game sampling here is very small due to time limitations.Our general take-away from our time with the AMD FX-8150 and gaming is that the game matters when it comes to performance deltas.We played a lot of Battlefield 3 Beta Multipl...
Cet avis était-il utile?
-
Publié: 2011-10-11, Auteur: Ryan , review by: pcper.com
The allure of having the "world's first destop 8-core processor" is more than slightly muted by the performance results we saw in our review today. Obviously the Bulldozer design team had to make some decisions years ago that couldn't be easily rolled ba...
So, is it success or failure? I am sure most of you would love to see a clear and definite verdict here. However, things are not so simple this time and AMD Bulldozer made things really difficult for all reviewers. The thing is that AMD revealed a tot...
Extrait: Designing and releasing a new CPU architecture is risky business. You are essentially trying to forecast consumers interest, software and hardware development for the lifetime of that product. No doubts about it it is a gamble. If your forecast, the m...
Eight-core processing for under $250, Speedy for the price with multi-threaded software, Unlocked for overclocking
Slower than cheaper chips in tests with single-threaded apps, New AM3+ socket demands new motherboard
AMD's first "Bulldozer" processor has eight cores, but its performance can't match Intel's pricier Core i7 CPUs. Still, it's a forward-looking, good-value CPU for heavy use with multi-threaded apps. ...
Extrait: AMD had us and a few others down to its Austin, Texas offices a couple of weeks ago and gave us quite and overclocking show with its new FX processors. We carried our cameras along in hopes to give you a front row seat at the event and hopefully whet your...
