Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 224 examens experts du AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus et l'estimation moyenne est 67%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
(67%)
224 Avis
Note moyenne issue des avis d’experts sur ce produit.
Utilisateurs
-
0 Avis
Note moyenne délivrée par les utilisateurs du produit.
670100224
Les éditeurs ont aimé
Gravure 32nm
Clarté de l'offre
Modèle débloqué
Aptitudes en overclocking
Performances dans les applications tirant parti de la présence de plusieurs coeurs
Mode Turbo à deux paliers
Les éditeurs n'ont pas aimé
Performances pas au niveau
Positionnement tarifaire à revoir
Consommation/échauffement
Consommation électrique
Les performances devraient être plus élevées par rapport à l'ancienne génération et à la concurrence
Based on the tests we've conducted, the only end-users who could benefit from the new AMD chip are PC professionals that deal with sophisticated audio and video encoding, rendering, virtualization, and/or heavy workstation/server loads which max out C...
Cet avis était-il utile?
-
Publié: 2011-10-19, Auteur: Scott , review by: Techreport.com
Extrait: You probably know this by now, since it seems pretty much everyone has read our initial review of AMD's FX-8150 processors, but the "Bulldozer" architecture on which the FX chips are based is a "speed demon"—a CPU designed to run naturally at high clock f...
Extrait: AMD's Bulldozer processor architecture has been in the works for many years and has been delayed many times, causing all sorts of speculations. The "Zambezi" FX processor is one part of the Scorpius platform which combines the "world's first consumer...
Cet avis était-il utile?
-
Publié: 2011-10-14, Auteur: James , review by: futurelooks.com
I am honestly not sure what to make of the FX-8150. I did not really lose or gain any performance in games. While this is disheartening, such is not the case with Sandra 2011. In every benchmark I ran in Sandra, with the exception of the SHA-256 results,...
Incredible Multi Threaded Performance, Excellent Price/Performance Ratio, Smooth Working Turbo Core For Speed Boost, Dual Turbo Modes For Increased Boost In Lightly Threaded Apps, Maintains Excellent Temps At Stock Speeds, Black Edition With Unlocked Multiplier, Eight Physical Cores, Easily Achieves High Overclocks, Excellent OC Performance Scaling, Easily Tweaked With AOD For Maximum Performan
Performance In Single Threaded Apps Not On Par With Multithreaded, Gold, Discuss this review in our forums
It’s been a long wait for Bulldozer’s arrival, with the date being pushed back again and again. Naturally, that had me going in looking for the flaw that kept it from coming to market on any of the previous announced release dates. Was the architectur...
Cet avis était-il utile?
Award
-
Publié: 2011-10-12, Auteur: Nick , review by: icrontic.com
Bulldozer is the culmination of five years of effort and considerable heartache for AMD. They had a solid lead on Intel with the Athlon 64, but steadily lost momentum to Intel’s aggressive Tick Tock strategy over the ensuing half decade. AMD seemed to...
In many cases, AMD's FX-8150 is able to close the gap between the Phenom II X6 and Intel's Core i5 2500K. Given the right workload, Bulldozer is actually able to hang with Intel's fastest Sandy Bridge parts. We finally have a high-end AMD CPU with power g...
Breaking down our benchmark results we find that the AMD FX-8150 offers huge performance improvements over the Phenom II range when testing with Excel 2010, while it matched the Core i5-2500K and Core i7 920 processors. Our custom WinRAR benchmark als...
Honestly, AMD's Bulldozer didn't turn out as impressive as it sounded. In many applications, it is barely better than the Phenom II X6 1100T, and in a few others it's actually worse. However, these applications either weren't highly multi-threaded, or ...
time Alrighty, time to give a small overview of the previous pages : The AMD FX-8150 CPU out of the box, is not really what many might have expected. Why ? As it is hardly any better in older apps then the previous AMD Thuban lineup. I explicitly ment...
