Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 224 examens experts du AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus et l'estimation moyenne est 67%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
(67%)
224 Avis
Note moyenne issue des avis d’experts sur ce produit.
Utilisateurs
-
0 Avis
Note moyenne délivrée par les utilisateurs du produit.
670100224
Les éditeurs ont aimé
Gravure 32nm
Clarté de l'offre
Modèle débloqué
Aptitudes en overclocking
Performances dans les applications tirant parti de la présence de plusieurs coeurs
Mode Turbo à deux paliers
Les éditeurs n'ont pas aimé
Performances pas au niveau
Positionnement tarifaire à revoir
Consommation/échauffement
Consommation électrique
Les performances devraient être plus élevées par rapport à l'ancienne génération et à la concurrence
Extrait: Ok. You, the readers, were right. We screwed up. I'll be the first to admit that when we picked the components for our current cooler testing machine a few years back, we blew it.It's not that the gear is bad, per se, it just isn't best-suited for testing...
Extrait: Benchmarking 86 CPUs takes a while. After long last, though, we have 51 models from AMD and 35 from Intel tested in our current suite. If you want to know how your processor sizes up to its competition, you'll find plenty of comparison data inside! 86 C...
Extrait: To no real surprise at all, bdver1 led to the best results for this AMD FX-8150 Bulldozer processor, the only interesting facts are the improvements by which the resulting binaries were faster for the different workloads compared to the other compil...
Extrait: Under some workloads Ubuntu 12.10 is faster on the AMD FX-8150 system while in other cases it's noticeably slower than Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS. Stay tuned for some more articles coming out shortly that look at the performance changes in finer detail ...
Publié: 2012-08-23, Auteur: Scott , review by: Techreport.com
Extrait: As you may know, a while back, we came to some difficult realizations about the validity of our methods for testing PC gaming performance. In my article Inside the second: A new look at game benchmarking, we explained why the widely used frames-per-second...
The new Core i7-3770K is a no-brainer if you were considering buying the Core i7-2600K; it costs the same and is faster.It is, however, very important to understand that this processor is targeted to users who will really benefit from additional proces...
Extrait: While Himeno between K8 and bdver1 yields a net performance improvement, when targeting k8-sse3/btver1/barcelona the performance was actually even better than when bdver1 was used. Lastly, with C-Ray there is a small performance improvement in moving...
Modular and versatile architecture, Great performance in multithreaded applications, Great overclocking potential
General performance below expectations, and rival products, High power consumption under load, compared to Intel's chips, Not the best choice for hardcore gamers
AMD Bulldozer is with us for months now, more than enough time has passed for the product to set into its market slot. Bulldozer and AMD did not live up to expectations, nor did they deliver a competitive desktop product which they very much need right...
Extrait: This time we'd like to offer you the summarized test results of as many as 71 processors. This generally marks the end of the year, not the end of another test method's life cycle (like the last time). We believe this summary contains all important pro...
New processor architectures don’t come round all that often and there was a great deal of excitement in anticipation of Bulldozer. Breaking with the traditional vision of cores, its CMT architecture was indeed promising on paper but its integration wit...
