fr.testseek.com  

 
 
Rechercher:   
 

Accueil » Ordinateurs » CPU » Intel » Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.2c 3.2GHz Socket 478



Travail en cours
Patientez SVP...

  Avis experts    

Reviews of Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.2c 3.2GHz Socket 478

Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 8 examens experts du Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.2c 3.2GHz Socket 478 et l'estimation moyenne est 84%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.2c 3.2GHz Socket 478.
 
(84%)
8 Avis
Utilisateurs
(100%)
3 Avis
84 0 100 8

 

Avis

page 1 de 1
Classer par:
Note
 
  Publié: 2003-06-01, review by: HEXUS.net

  • Arguably the fastest x86 around, Excellent default performance on either a Springdale or Canterwood motherboard, Should pave the way for price cuts on lower P4 Cs
  • Will undoubtedly be pricey, Will soon be replaced by the more potent Prescott core, Didn't overclock as well as we'd hoped
  • Testing and reviewing this processor was something of an anti-climax. We knew it was going to be faster than anything we'd had before. It duly obliged us with the fastest set of stock benchmarks we've seen thus far. There's little need for us to discuss its performance...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(80%)
 
  Publié: 2003-10-23, review by: pcstats.com

  • Extrait:  The P4 3.2C, like the other C-class processors, runs on a 800 MHz FSB Northword core.

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2003-06-24, review by: sharkyextreme.com

  • Extrait:  Introduction Intel has certainly been laying out the performance lumber over the last few months, with the release of the powerful i875P and i865PE chipsets, a 3.0 GHz Pentium 4 supporting the 800 MHz front-side, and lower-speed Pentium 4-2.8C, 2.6C an...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(90%)
 
  Publié: 2003-06-23, review by: HardCOREware.net

  • Extrait:  Is This The End of the Line for 0.13? This review is going to be one of the tougher ones to write about for me... Coming off our Intel @ 3GHz Platform Overview where we covered Intels latest technology and platforms, its going to be tough to talk abo...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2003-06-23, review by: neoseeker.com

  • Extrait:  As we discussed in our Barton 3000+ review, Intel was soon to release a 3.2Ghz Pentium 4 chip based on their new 800Mhz FSB (200Mhz core clock speed) and Springdale/Canterwood platform. Well that time is upon us now as Intel formally introduces its la...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2003-06-23, review by: firingsquad.com

  • Extrait:  Now that the clock speed war is over, AMD and Intel have been slowly improving the underlying architecture of their flagship processors. After all, a 200MHz clock speed improvement does little if there are other bottlenecks that are preventing the CPU ...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(84%)
 
  Publié: 2003-06-22, review by: hothardware.com

  • Extrait:  Intel Pentium 4 3.2GHz Performance Evaluation Another speed bump served up by Intel with ease By, Dave Altavilla June 23, 2003 Once again, Intel has decided to turn up the heat on their arch rival, AMD. In a sort of digital ying-yang, the battle for Perfo...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2003-10-31, review by: tek.no

  • God ytelse, Fortsatt potensiale for overklokking, HyperThreading, Veldig mange gode hovedkort å velge blant
  • Høy pris = dårlig pris / ytelse forhold, Ikke den raskeste desktopprosessoren på markedet, Socket 478 skal "snart" fases ut
  • Det er helt tydelig at Pentium 4 3,2 GHz er overlegen Athlon XP 3200+. Faktisk vinner Pentium 4 i nesten samtlige øvelser. Når det gjelder Athlon 64 FX er historien en ganske annen. Intel og AMD har med Athlon 64 FX snudd sitt tradisjonelle forhold på...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
    page 1 de 1  
 
Autres produits populaires de la même catégorie