fr.testseek.com  

 
 
Rechercher:   
 

Accueil » Ordinateurs » CPU » AMD » AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 2.4GHz Socket 939



Travail en cours
Patientez SVP...

  Avis experts    

Reviews of AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 2.4GHz Socket 939

Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 8 examens experts du AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 2.4GHz Socket 939 et l'estimation moyenne est 84%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 2.4GHz Socket 939.
 
(84%)
8 Avis
Utilisateurs
-
0 Avis
84 0 100 8

 

Avis

page 1 de 1
Classer par:
Note
 
  Publié: 2004-06-01, review by: HEXUS.net

  • Our final evaluation includes a mixture of good and bad. Were happy that AMDs released its premier CPUs without the user having to use registered memory. Just this fact opens up top-end performance for the enthusiast with deep pockets. Stock perform...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(70%)
 
  Publié: 2004-06-01, review by: hothardware.com

  • Extrait:  Since we last took a look at their Athlon 64 FX-53 back in March, AMD has remained relatively quiet. There was a low profile release of the mid-range Athlon 64 2800+ into the channel, but nothing really new has come from CPU lines at AMD for almost 3 mont...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2004-06-01, review by: sharkyextreme.com

  • Slightly Higher Performance Relative to Socket 940, DualChannel PC3200 DDR, No More Registered DDR
  • Expensive
  • Throughout the review and benchmarking process, one thought kept coming to the fore: Socket 939 is where the Athlon 64 belongs. The flexibility of standard DDR and the power of an integrated dual-channel memory controller make for a potent combination...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(90%)
 
  Publié: 2004-06-01, review by: gamepyre.com

  • The future is bright for the AMD Athlon FX53 and Athlon 64 platforms. In the near future we will likely see motherboard manufacturers include PCI-Express in the 939 platform, making this the way to go if you want to go down the AMD route in CPUs. Of co...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(84%)
 
  Publié: 2004-09-01, review by: tweaktown.com

  • When it comes to upgrades, I generally use the rule of 10. If a new product offers at least a 10% increase in performance, then it is worthy of being a replacement for the old components. The number 10 comes into play because as a general rule, you wil...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
  Award


(95%)
 
  Publié: 2004-03-22, review by: Zdnet.com.au

  • Extrait:  The FX-53 (Sledgehammer core) is 200MHz faster than its predecessor, the FX-51, pushing the clock speed envelope to 2.4GHz. The former also retains the 1MB of L2 (Level 2) cache to feed the number-crunching monster.

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2004-06-18, review by: tek.no

  • Trolig markedes raskeste CPU, Støtter CoolnQuiet, Ikke lenger behov for REGminne
  • Uforholdsmessig dyr, PCIe for Socket 939 er enda ikke klart
  • Vi har i denne testen sett at overgangen fra Socket 940 til Socket 939 i praksis har svært lite å si for ytelsen til Athlon 64 FX. Det omtalte ytelsestapet som REG-minne har medført på Socket 940-plattformen er mindre enn mange kanskje har forestilt s...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2017-06-06, Auteur: Max1024 , review by: overclockers.ru

  • В принципе, графики понятно обрисовали общую картину. Можно лишь отметить, что Opteron 64 250 степпинга E4 при прочих равных условиях немного вырывается вперед, а лучший результат у материнской платы на чипсете VIA K8T800. Надеюсь, процессоры AMD Athlo...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
    page 1 de 1  
 
Autres produits populaires de la même catégorie