fr.testseek.com  

 
 
Rechercher:   
 

Accueil » Ordinateurs » CPU » AMD » AMD Athlon 64 3400+ 2.2GHz Socket 939



Travail en cours
Patientez SVP...

  Avis experts    

Reviews of AMD Athlon 64 3400+ 2.2GHz Socket 939

Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 8 examens experts du AMD Athlon 64 3400+ 2.2GHz Socket 939 et l'estimation moyenne est 85%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour AMD Athlon 64 3400+ 2.2GHz Socket 939.
 
(85%)
8 Avis
Utilisateurs
-
0 Avis
85 0 100 8

 

Avis

page 1 de 1
Classer par:
Note
 
  Publié: 2004-01-01, review by: HEXUS.net

  • Overclocking a CPU using nothing more than default voltage can often yield useful information about a CPUs current headroom. Other factors come into play, surely, but empirical research has shown that a review CPUs potential is often very similar to...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(80%)
 
  Publié: 2004-02-23, review by: Bjorn3d.com

  • Extrait:  Check out this review to see how AMDs latest socket 754 processor - the Athlon64 3400+ - performs versus the Athlon64 3200+ and the Athlon64 FX-51. At 2.2GHz, the 3400+ throws down some awesome performance numbers. Be sure to check it out!

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2004-01-18, Auteur: Lars-Göran , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • The Athlon 64 3400+ is a step forward for AMD, taking the crown for fastest consumer processor in the process. The asking price is high, but far more reasonable than the FX51 and the P4EE....

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(80%)
 
  Publié: 2004-01-06, review by: hothardware.com

  • Extrait:  The AMD Athlon 64 3400+: The Athlon 64 Gets Its First Speed Bump... By, Marco Chiappetta January 6, 2004 AMD closed out 2003 by quietly releasing the Athlon 64 3000+. The 3000+ was clocked at the same 2.0GHz as the Athlon 64 3200+, and it used the same 75...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2004-01-06, review by: sharkyextreme.com

  • Highest Performance Mainstream CPU, 2.2 GHz Core, Affordable Platform Costs
  • SingleChannel DDR Controller
  • The Athlon 64 3400+ has finally delivered on the promise of the AMD64 mainstream design, and its high-end performance and economical platform costs have made the Athlon FX-51 virtually superfluous. AMD has delivered high-end performance at a more main...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(90%)
 
  Publié: 2004-01-05, review by: HardCOREware.net

  • Extrait:  Speed Bump Ahead Im pleased to announce that we are finally able to review AMD processors again! Its been over a year since our last AMD review, so a lot has changed since then. From here on out, we will be able to cover a lot more products, includin...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2004-01-05, review by: firingsquad.com

  • Extrait:  When the Athlon 64 FX-51 debuted on September 23 of 2003, we were blown away by its performance. Even Intel’s Pentium 4 3.2GHz Extreme Edition succumbed to the FX’s gaming alacrity. At the same time, it was tough to find and almost prohibitive...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(92%)
 
  Publié: 2004-01-06, review by: tek.no

  • Svært god ytelse, Skalerer svært godt med klokkefrekvens, Betydelig billigere enn FX51 og yter omtrent likt, Blir ikke særlig varm
  • Overklokker dårlig?
  • Athlon 64 3400+ har fått en økning i PR-ratingen i på 200 i forhold til 3200+, som tilsvarer 6,25%. Økningen i klokkefrekvens er derimot på 10% og kan neppe sees på som noe annet enn en ytterligere innskjerping av TPI-ratingen fra AMDs side. Tidligere...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
    page 1 de 1  
 
Autres produits populaires de la même catégorie