Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 100 examens experts du AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 3.5GHz Socket AM4 et l'estimation moyenne est 93%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 3.5GHz Socket AM4.
November 2019
(93%)
100 Avis
Note moyenne issue des avis d’experts sur ce produit.
Utilisateurs
-
0 Avis
Note moyenne délivrée par les utilisateurs du produit.
stabilité des performances, performances de jeu, 16 cœurs et 32 threads, économe en énergie, technologie d'avenir, PCI Express 4.0, socket AM4, dissipateur thermique soudé
enveloppe thermique peu fiable, plateforme X570 relativement chère, peu de marge d'overlocking, prix élevé
En test: l'AMD Ryzen 9 3950X. Modèle de test fourni parLa famille AMD Ryzen 300 marque des points avec une bonne efficience énergétique tant que les processeurs sont utilisés dans le champ de leurs spécifications. Avec l'AMD Ryzen 9 3950X, AMD lance un p...
Performances en production, Consommation maitrisée, Prix
Pas toujours devant le 3900X
On l'avoue tout de suite, le RYZEN 9 3950X nous laisse un petit goût de trop peu. Nous attendions réellement des performances à la hausse par rapport au 3900X et ce n'est pas forcément toujours le cas. Bon clairement, les performances ne sont pas mauvaise...
Extrait: Lors du lancement officiel des processeurs AMD s'appuyant l'architecture Zen 2, les rouges ont également dévoilé un Ryzen 9 3950X constitué de 16 cœurs et censé être commercialisé en septembre. Las, il fut reporté par AMD de 2 mois, à la grande déception...
Performance powerhouse, Cheaper than HEDT, PCIe 4.0, Fits in AM4 socket
Needs extra cooling, Limited gaming advantage
The Ryzen 9 3950X is a performance champ, going toe-to-toe with HEDT processors that should be in a different league. It may take a bit to keep cool, but if you follow AMD's guidance, you'll end up with a processor that takes on gaming and multi-core work...
Absolutely mind-blowing performance from 32 threads, Reasonable AIO cooling loops will handle this without issue, Strong multi and single threaded performance, PCI-E 4.0 support, 105W TDP, Compatible with a B450 motherboard for £100, Can be clocked down
The 3700X might be just as good based on your usage, Not a true replacement for HEDT if you need the additional PCI-E or Memory lanes, No cooler included
When AMD promised the 3950X in July, we waited patiently but with a real sense of anticipation; the jump from quad-core to octa-core took far too long in the consumer space, but to then jump from 8 to 16 cores in the space of two years is massively impres...
The AMD Ryzen 9 3950X is a revelation – a brilliant processor that beats every rival with room to spare.It's the fastest mainstream chip available right now for multi-threaded applications bar none – and it's faster than Intel's forthcoming Core i9-10980X...
Massive multi-core performance, True HEDT credentials, Restrained on power, AMD's fastest gaming chip, Excellent choice of motherboards
Nothing of note
The AMD onslaught on the mainstream PC computing space continues with the Ryzen 9 3950X. Bringing all that is best from the 3rd Generation architecture to bear in an AM4 socket, the chip houses 16 cores, 32 threads, oodles of cache, and keeps inside a rel...
Publié: 2019-11-14, Auteur: Luke , review by: kitguru.net
Excellent multi-threaded capability, Brings HEDT levels of performance to a cost-effective mainstream platform, Strong single- and lightly threaded performance thanks to Precision Boost 2, Completely unparalleled power efficiency, Native PCIe Gen 4.0, Sca
Not as strong value as some of the other Ryzen 3000 offerings, Extra PCIe lanes and quad-channel memory can benefit HEDT competitors
With the Ryzen 9 3950X, AMD has delivered a high-performance 16-core processor to the cost-effective, mainstream AM4 platform. And in doing so, AMD positions itself well to compete against Intel's current and upcoming HEDT lines.You get out-of-the-box per...
There was never much doubt that the Ryzen 9 3950X was going to wipe the floor with the rest of the mainstream stack, and that's mostly turned out to be true. It's faster, with a couple of close calls such as Premiere Pro, where it wasn't that much quicker...
