Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 46 examens experts du Battlefield 3 et l'estimation moyenne est 84%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour Battlefield 3.
October 2011
(84%)
46 Avis
Note moyenne issue des avis d’experts sur ce produit.
Utilisateurs
-
0 Avis
Note moyenne délivrée par les utilisateurs du produit.
Battlefield 3 nous propose pour la première fois dans la saga (hors Company) une campagne solo. Le moins que l’on puisse dire, c’est que les développeurs auraient largement pu s'en passer. En effet, celle-ci est d’une calamité sans nom. Honnêtement, on...
Astonishing, benchmark-setting graphics, The best multiplayer experience in the genre
Single player campaign is a dumb Call of Duty clone, Frustrating sharpshooter enemy AI
Despite the mostly duff single-player campaign, Battlefield 3 is an essential buy for its fantastic, epic-scale multiplayer action. While PC gamers get the best of it, with a higher player cap and better graphics, console games still get the authentic Bat...
Easily vying for the position of best multiplayer game on PS3, Battlefield 3 is fantastic online and shows DICE’s mastery in the field. The less said about the ignorable single-player, the better. It’s not a game to buy for offline alone.More Articles...
Multiplayer, Frostbite 2 game engine, Optmised for PCs
Single player campaign, Not quite the full package, Need a new PC to play
So Battlefield 3 isn't quite perfect incarnate and console gamers are already complaining that it's much better than on a PC. But across the board, the multi-player action is the best you can find online Full Battlefield 3 review on CVG Battlefield 3
There is one last thing that, due to words spoken and gauntlets thrown, everyone's going to want to know: who's won the war of the FPS this year. Whilst Battlefield 3 is an incredibly strong contender, it's a little bit rough around the edges, and some fa...
Overall, Battlefield 3 is a good solid game, but there are some definite places left for improvement. The single player would have been more successful if the player could just create a local server against bots as you could in Battlefield 1942, 2, and ...
Graphics, sound, and physics are fantastic, Tons of unlocks (though many repeat), Multiplayer has potential for excellence, Establishing your own play style is fun and rewarding, Battlelog if you like that kind of thing,
Single player is more or less WhacAMole on rails, occasionally frustrating, Multiplayer plagued by lag, RPG spam, Maps lack real diversity, Ingame UI is simply awful, Battlelog if, like me, you don’t like that kind of thing
This review came off as rather negative, which is good, because I meant it to. The expectations were high for Battlefield 3, and I think that DICE advanced the wrong aspects of the game. It’s not a bad game by any means, but Battlefield players will kn...
