fr.testseek.com  

 
 
Rechercher:   
 

Accueil » Électroménager » Média-player sans fil » Slim Devices Transporter



Travail en cours
Patientez SVP...

  Avis experts    

Reviews of Slim Devices Transporter

Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 15 examens experts du Slim Devices Transporter et l'estimation moyenne est 80%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour Slim Devices Transporter.
 
(80%)
15 Avis
Utilisateurs
-
0 Avis
80 0 100 15

 

Avis

page 1 de 2
Classer par:
Note
 
  Publié: 2007-01-17, review by: T3.com

  • Amazingly sumptuous sound with uncompressed audio, Easy to use, Looks a million dollars.
  • Ouch - that price tag!, The quality of the audio reveals flaws in compressed audio, too.
  • Its a specialist device, at a premium price. However, if you want the very best sound, the Transporter delivers in spades

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(80%)
 
  Publié: 2006-08-01, review by: theregister.co.uk

  • Slim Devices Transporter looks good and sounds great. Its not for everyone - if your digital music collection consists entirely of 128Kbps MP3s, youre going to hear why audiophiles prefer lossless music formats. But if youre the proud owner of a h...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2008-08-27, review by: avguide.com

  • Slim Devices has set out to build a hifi version of its successful Squeezebox with components that meet audiophile standards. The result is the Transporter, a stylish component that sets a new standard for design and sound quality among wireless musi...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2007-11-01, review by: avrev.com

  • Extrait:  Whether we are in the car driving to the grocery store or on a plane suffering through yet another painful flight to somewhere, music lovers are able to access what used to be an impossibly large music collection right in the palms of our hands. Why sh...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2007-10-07, review by: tnt-audio.com

  • Extrait:  The Transporter is Slime Devices audiophile streaming device. While the standard SB3 isnt bad, I certainly wouldnt rate it as true hi-fi, and I dont think that SD have ever touted it as such. As I have found with my modified SB3, it can do a very g...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2007-10-01, review by: avrev.com

  • Extrait:  Media servers are becoming more prevalent in today’s society. Music servers tend to come in two general flavors: those with built-in storage, such as iPods, Request and Escient, and those without, such as the Slim Devices units. The Slim Devices mus...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2007-06-20, review by: bigpicturebigsound.com

  • Overall, the Transporter is a very impressive entry from Logitech into the high-end audio field. There are still legions of passionate audiophiles around the world who only grudgingly accept CDs as "passable" in sound quality (as opposed to vinyl LPs),...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(75%)
 
  Publié: 2007-03-06, review by: audioholics.com

  • Extrait:  I hate CD players. Theyre bulky and they typically play only 1-5 discs at a time - unless you get a CD changer and thats like getting the family pack at Krystal - it isnt about quality. Were no strangers to Slim Devices Digital Network Music Player...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(85%)
 
  Publié: 2007-02-01, review by: stereophile.com

  • Extrait:  Is a high-end music server the audio equivalent of polishing a turd?

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2006-12-01, review by: Soundstage.com

  • Extrait:  You’d have been hard-pressed to have a conversation with me about audio or video components in the last few months and not hear me talk about Slim Devices’ Squeezebox and Transporter network music players. Now, some might think that much of what I’m ...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
    page 1 de 2 « Précédent   1 2   Suivant »  
 
Autres produits populaires de la même catégorie