fr.testseek.com  

 
 
Rechercher:   
 

Accueil » Téléphones » Téléphones portables » Sony Xperia X Performance



Travail en cours
Patientez SVP...

  Avis experts    

Reviews of Sony Xperia X Performance

Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 185 examens experts du Sony Xperia X Performance et l'estimation moyenne est 75%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour Sony Xperia X Performance.
Award: Most Awarded August 2016
August 2016
 
(75%)
185 Avis
Utilisateurs
(88%)
29 Avis
75 0 100 185

Les éditeurs ont aimé

  • Finition et design
  •  Etanchéité
  •  Qualité de l'écran
  • La qualité des photos avec une bonne lumière
  • La rapidité de la mise au point
  • Le support de la 4G+ sur 4 bandes de fréquence
  • Une interface ergonomique
  • Appareil photo
  • Performances globales
  • Finitions

Les éditeurs n'ont pas aimé

  • Autonomie polyvalente
  •  Qualité photographique toujours en retrait
  • Les performances en retrait
  • L'utilisation de plastique
  • Un design qui commence à dater
  • Prix élevé Bordures de l'écran

Show Show

 

Avis

page 2 de 19
Classer par:
Note
 
  Publié: 2016-08-01, Auteur: Chris , review by: slashgear.com

  • The Sony Xperia X Performance suffers from Sony's inability to survive only on their basic software finesse and high-quality hardware builds. That's unfortunate. Instead they seem to have to jam in as much software and promotions as they can to make the m...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2016-07-28, Auteur: Paul , review by: dxomark.com

  • Fast and accurate autofocus in bright and low light, Good target exposure and dynamic range, Wellcontrolled noise in low light, White balance is generally very good, Good detail preservation using flash
  • Auto HDR mode sometimes fails to trigger, Slight chromatic noise visible in outdoor pictures, White balance is not repeatable over consecutive shots using flash

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(88%)
 
  Publié: 2016-07-28, Auteur: Paul , review by: dxomark.com

  • Fast and accurate autofocus in bright and low light, Good target exposure and dynamic range, Wellcontrolled noise in low light, White balance is generally very good, Good detail preservation using flash
  • Auto HDR mode sometimes fails to trigger, Slight chromatic noise visible in outdoor pictures, White balance is not repeatable over consecutive shots using flash

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(88%)
 
  Publié: 2016-07-26, Auteur: Tim , review by: techspot.com

  • Great 23megapixel camera. System performance is excellent thanks to the Snapdragon 820 inside. Frontfacing stereo speakers.
  • Dated, chunky design. Poor battery life. Display has improved very little in three years. Bloatware. No 4K video recording or USBC. Expensive.

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(60%)
 
  Publié: 2016-07-24, Auteur: Tomas , review by: hw4all.com

  • Extrait:  Certainly one of the fastest growing segments of the consumer electronics market are smartphone. This is due to the fact that they have long since moved from the category of simple “dialers” in universal solutions for business and pleasure. Judge for your...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2016-07-19, Auteur: Tomas , review by: hw4all.com

  • Extrait:  Certainly one of the fastest growing segments of the consumer electronics market are smartphone. This is due to the fact that they have long since moved from the category of simple “dialers” in universal solutions for business and pleasure...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2016-07-14, Auteur: Engadget , review by: engadget.com

  • Flagship-level performance, Water-resistant design, Lightweight, unobtrusive Android skin
  • Not worth the asking price, Lacks some features you'd expect from a flagship, Middling camera, Occasionally overheats
  • Sony, what are you doing? Though the $700 Xperia X Performance features a flagship-level processor and runs well as a result, Sony apparently didn't feel the need to bring anything new to the table. What we have here is a reasonably good smartphone th...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(72%)
 
  Publié: 2016-07-11, Auteur: Florence , review by: greenbot.com

  • Water resistant, Same Snapdragon 820 as the rest of the flagship competition
  • Disappointing battery life, Design doesn't feel premium
  • The Xperia X Performance is totally not worth its flagship title, though it'd be a worthy buy if it were $200 cheaper...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(60%)
 
  Publié: 2016-07-11, Auteur: Florence , review by: pcworld.com_techhive.com

  • Water resistant, Same Snapdragon 820 as the rest of the flagship competition
  • Disappointing battery life, Design doesn't feel premium
  • The Xperia X Performance is totally not worth its flagship title, though it'd be a worthy buy if it were $200 cheaper...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(60%)
 
  Publié: 2016-07-08, Auteur: Lanh , review by: androidauthority.com

  • Classic Sony design, Metal back, Unintrusive software, microSD expansion, Good camera, Front facing speakers, Vibrant display
  • No fingerprint sensor, No 4K video recording, Volume/camera key feel cheap, Overpriced, considering what it lacks
  • The Sony Xperia X Performance is a good smartphone, but it lacks some key features that are expected from flagships, and its current price point makes the device overpriced, and offers poor value for the money...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(162%)
    page 2 de 19 « Précédent   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 19   Suivant »  
 
Autres produits populaires de la même catégorie