fr.testseek.com  

 
 
Rechercher:   
 

Accueil » Ordinateurs » Notebooks » Asus UX305CA Zenbook



Travail en cours
Patientez SVP...

  Avis experts    

Reviews of Asus UX305CA Zenbook

Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 73 examens experts du Asus UX305CA Zenbook et l'estimation moyenne est 82%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour Asus UX305CA Zenbook .
Award: Good Buy December 2015
December 2015
 
(82%)
73 Avis
Utilisateurs
(74%)
419 Avis
82 0 100 73

Les éditeurs ont aimé

  • Très léger
  • Finition impeccable
  • Silencieux
  • Chauffe très peu
  • Écran lumineux et contrasté
  • Un châssis robuste
  • Une bonne finition pour le prix
  • SSD très véloce
  • De bonnes performances
  • Inaudible
  • Faible chauffe
  • Dalle lumineuse à finition matte
  • Fin et très léger
  • écran mat
  • Température maîtrisée
  • Bon clavier
  • Bonne autonomie
  • SSD rapide

Les éditeurs n'ont pas aimé

  • Pas de rétroéclairage pour le clavier
  • Larges bandes autour de l'écran
  • Blancs un peu brûlés
  • Autonomie en retrait par rapport au modèle de l'année dernière
  • Bridage des performances
  • Autonomie
  • Clavier non rétroéclairé Webcam à l'image délavé Pas de port USB TypeC
  • Contraste de l'écran médiocre
  • Clavier non rétroéclairé

Show Show

 

Avis

page 2 de 8
Classer par:
Note
 
  Publié: 2016-03-11, Auteur: Jim , review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • The Asus ZenBook UX305CA is a sensible, perhaps predictable upgrade to the UX305 we looked at last year. It has newer CPU, and a much higher-resolution screen. However, it remains a seriously portable, expensive-feeling laptop that really isn't that expen...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(80%)
 
  Publié: 2016-02-17, Auteur: Edward , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Entry-level model is great value, Faster than last year's model, Looks lovely, Great keyboard and decent screen
  • High-resolution screen unnecessary, Battery life on model tested is mediocre, Touchpad isn't very good, High-end model isn't worth the money
  • Asus UX305CA – Performance The addition of Intel's new Skylake-based Core M processor to this machine has made quite a difference to its performance. While it still trails most other Ultrabooks, I recorded a noticeable 36% jump in the Cinebench R15 benchm...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(70%)
 
  Publié: 2016-02-10, Auteur: James , review by: Theinquirer.net

  • 3200x1800 display, great battery life, enhanced performance, super-slim, good value
  • Small SSD, not ideal for the most demanding tasks
  • While this Skylake refresh is still short on both high-end power and internal storage, there's plenty here to justify the upgrade; in particular, the premium display and well-above-average battery life.These sizeable improvements elevate what was already...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(80%)
 
  Publié: 2016-02-06, review by: v3.co.uk

  • 3200x1800 display, great battery life, enhanced performance, super-slim, good value,
  • Small SSD, lots of bloatware, not ideal for the most demanding tasks
  • Asus upgrades much more than just the processor in this Skylake refresh of one of 2015's best mid-range laptops. It's still not perfect but the new QHD+ display, Windows 10 OS and an even wider range of ports make for an highly tempting ultraportable...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(80%)
 
  Publié: 2016-01-18, review by: gadgetshow.channel5.com

  • Extrait:  Taiwanese hardware maker Asus has been in the laptop game for a long while and knows what it takes to put a decent notebook together, and the Asus ZenBook UX305CA is a slim and light piece of kit that aims to take on Apple's skinniest laptops. Is it any g...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(80%)
 
  Publié: 2016-03-11, Auteur: Sascha , review by: notebookcheck.net

  • matte screen, runs noiselessly, low temperature development, decent keyboard, good battery life, Fast SSD
  • screen's middling contrast, no keyboard backlight
  • Asus' Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T is a lightweight and very slim 13.3-inch subnotebook. The installed Core m7 processor has enough computing power for routine application scenarios. Its low TDP allows passive cooling. Thus, the laptop usually runs noiselessly...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(89%)
 
  Publié: 2016-03-01, Auteur: Andrew , review by: Laptopmag.com

  • Colorful display, Very light, Long battery life, Comfortable keyboard, Attractive price
  • Quiet speakers, Core m3 processor not very fast
  • The Asus ZenBook UX305CA is a sleek 13-inch laptop with long battery life and a beautiful display for a great price...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(80%)
 
  Publié: 2016-01-28, Auteur: Joshua , review by: hothardware.com

  • 256GB SSD, Light and thin, Excellent battery life
  • No keyboard backlight, Keyboard vibration, Picks up fingerprints
  • The Asus ZenBook UX305CA is an evolutionary update to an already nice product, but this is one of cases in which that's a (mostly) good thing. The ZenBook's design and build quality are as good in this year's model as they were in the previous edition, so...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Publié: 2016-01-25, Auteur: William , review by: computershopper.com

  • Thin, light, attractive, Comfortable keyboard and touch pad, Strong battery life, Fanless and quiet, Good value for the money
  • Modest CPU, GPU performance, Keyboard not backlit, No touch screen
  • Like earlier ZenBook UX models, this impressively light, well-equipped Windows 10 ultrabook provides exceptional value at its $699 price. Read More…...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Publié: 2015-11-24, Auteur: Andrew , review by: arstechnica.com

  • Good mix of features for the price, Skylake and 802.11ac upgrades address some of the old model's biggest performance gripes, Solid construction, good keyboard, and decent selection of ports, Nice 1080p IPS screen, There's still a Microsoft Signature edit
  • No backlit keyboard, Mediocre trackpad. It doesn't have to be this way, No DisplayPort means no 60Hz 4K output, even though the new Core M chips support it

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
    page 2 de 8 « Précédent   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 8   Suivant »  
 
Autres produits populaires de la même catégorie