Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 224 examens experts du Intel Core i5 2500K 3.3GHz Socket 1155 et l'estimation moyenne est 91%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour Intel Core i5 2500K 3.3GHz Socket 1155.
January 2011
(91%)
224 Avis
Note moyenne issue des avis d’experts sur ce produit.
Utilisateurs
(96%)
1604 Avis
Note moyenne délivrée par les utilisateurs du produit.
910100224
Les éditeurs ont aimé
Performances dans les calculs
Performances dans les jeux
Mode Turbo
Consommation modérée
Puce graphique qui permet d'accélérer décodage et encodage vidéo
Compatible Blu-ray 3D
Architecture efficace
Améliorations probantes
Bonnes performances
Les éditeurs n'ont pas aimé
Puce graphique non DirectX 11
Cela aurait permis d'améliorer le débit dans certains jeux comme WoW
Due to issues with customs/logistics (no fault of AMD's), we're a bit late with our Bulldozer review. I suppose that is fitting in this case, but luckily, this gives us the chance to take a bit more time with the review, testing the Bulldozer CPU under it...
Extrait: After so much postponing, AMD is finally releasing its new processor series based on the “Bulldozer” architecture, the FX, featuring models with four, six, or eight processing cores. Let’s test the top-of-the-line, the eight-core AMD FX-8150 (3.6 GHz),...
Extrait: The CPU landscape is really complex. Both AMD and Intel offer tons of different models. But how would today’s processors perform if they didn't ......
All Pages Page 1 of 15Intel started 2011 off with the official introduction to their highly anticipated Sandy Bridge processors. We had the chance to take a look at their mid-range i5-2500k and we loved it. The i5-2500k isn’t perfect for everyone, tha...
Extrait: The general conclusion is a bit banal: Sandy Bridge is much better than the previous core. Not as much as Core 2 (Conroe) was better than Pentium 4, but it's still a larger step forward in terms of architecture than Nehalem compared with the..
Strong overall computing performance for the price. Good media-processing capabilities. Unlocked multiplier for simplified overclocking.
Does not support Hyper-Threading. Onboard video lacks DirectX 11 support, power of discrete video cards. Requires new motherboard.
The Intel Core i5-2500K offers exceptional value and impressive Sandy Bridge–based performance, but you can (and should) do better than this CPU's integrated graphics. Buy it now...
Publié: 2011-04-05, Auteur: Patrick , review by: servethehome.com
Overall, this is a big win for Intel. The new processors are faster and offer lower processing power than their Lynnfield counterparts and those are positive developments in the server space. Processors like the Xeon E3-1260L will be very popular in the u...
Extrait: It was exciting this week to finally see Intel's Sandy Bridge platform work under Linux with OpenGL acceleration without any problems, but it was even more exciting to see just how fast the Core i5 2500K graphics were under Linux using an open-source M...
Extrait: The long awaited and much anticipated Sandy Bridge architecture from Intel hit the ground running at CES just 2 weeks ago. This architecture promises better overall performance, the latest version of Intel Turbo Boost Technology 2.0, and great overcl...
Extrait: Lastly, with the usual Apache web-server benchmark, the Core i5 2500K performance was in front of the Core i7 970 by 36%. There is no doubt about it: Intel's Sandy Bridge is fast. In fact, it is damn fast. The Core i5 2500K retails for just over $220 ...
