fr.testseek.com  

 
 
Rechercher:   
 

Accueil » Ordinateurs » CPU » Intel » Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2.66GHz Socket 775



Travail en cours
Patientez SVP...

  Avis experts    

Reviews of Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2.66GHz Socket 775

Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 73 examens experts du Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2.66GHz Socket 775 et l'estimation moyenne est 79%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2.66GHz Socket 775.
 
(79%)
73 Avis
Utilisateurs
(94%)
351 Avis
79 0 100 73

Les éditeurs ont aimé

  • Performances de l’architecture Core
  • Premier Quad Core
  • Consommation et TDP contenus
  • Gain de performances important avec certaines applications…
  • Compatibilité
  • Plus attractif que 4x4
  • Consommation au repos
  • Performances dans les applications optimisées
  • Quadcore oblige
  • Bonnes performances dans les applications audio / vidéo / 3D
  • Reste très performant dans les applications non optimisées quadcore

Les éditeurs n'ont pas aimé

  • Hellip
  • Mais elles sont peu nombreuses
  • Prix.
  • Echauffement
  • Tarif trop élevé
  • Core 2 Duo Doublo
  • Consommation en charge
  • Consommation élevée
  • Désormais remplacé par les Q9000 et Q9050

Show Show

 

Avis

page 5 de 8
Classer par:
Note
 
  Publié: 2006-11-02, Auteur: Rich , review by: cnet.com

  • Major leap in performance on multitasking and most multithreaded applications compared to high-end dual-core CPUs; lots of apparent headroom for overclocking an already fast chip.
  • High price tag makes quad-core processing an elite technology for now; Apples twin dual-core Xeons in the Mac Pro make for a faster digital design configuration.
  • If you thought dual cores were over the top, get ready. Intel presents the Core 2 Extreme QX6700, a single CPU with four distinct processing cores. At $999, the first quad-core CPU will remain an enthusiast part for a while, but as a glimpse of the fut...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(87%)
 
  Publié: 2006-11-01, review by: neoseeker.com

  • Ok, I admit, that was a lot of test results to go through. But what is my overall opinion? Kentsfield, the QX6700, is a very interesting product, which will greatly benefit those that use highly multithreaded applications that can make good use of the...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Publié: 2006-11-01, review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • I think it is clear that quad-core is not for everyone at this moment in time, and that is exaggerated even more when you consider that the Core 2 Extreme QX6700 is going to retail for somewhere north of £650 including VAT. When you consider that a Cor...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Publié: 2006-11-01, review by: HardCOREware.net

  • Extrait:  Sooner Than Expected Probably the worst-kept secret in Intels recent history, the quad-core CPU codenamed Kentsfield is here. But can you blame them for wanting to spill their guts? Not only have they pretty much embarrassed AMD with the launch of C...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2006-11-01, review by: hothardware.com

  • Extrait:  To say this year has been a bit of a whirl-wind adventure would be an immense understatement. Weve seen Intel move from a back-seat position versus the Athlon 64 X2with their Pentium D architecture, to commanding virtually all of the lime-light as of late...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2006-11-01, review by: tomshardware.com

  • Extrait:  Just as the shock from the initial performance leap of Core 2 Duo wears off, Intel "leaps ahead" with a doubled-up version. Are we ready?

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2006-11-01, Auteur: Nathan , review by: legitreviews.com

  • Intel has unleased quad-core processors into the world and the Intel Core 2 Extreme Processor QX6700 is without a doubt the fastest desktop processor when it comes to applications that support four or more cores. In short the QX6700 is Quad-Zilla! I...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2006-11-01, review by: xbitlabs.com

  • Summing up I have to state that it will be very hard to draw a final line today. The thing is that Kentsfield processors have evidently got far ahead of their time. There are not that many applications yet that could use the potential of all four cores...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2006-11-01, review by: MotherBoards.org

  • After a few weeks of testing and retesting I can say that the QX6700 not only runs a bit cooler than its previous siblings and that it was entirely stable. We never even shut the thing down other than to reinstall Windows for the entire two weeks we te...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2006-11-01, review by: firingsquad.com

  • Extrait:  Up until a few years ago, clock speed was the number one barometer used by many to judge a CPU’s performance. It was a pretty simple formula: higher CPU clock speeds means better performance. With their Netburst Pentium 4 architecture, Intel in part...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
    page 5 de 8 « Précédent   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   Suivant »  
 
Autres produits populaires de la même catégorie