Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 89 examens experts du AMD Athlon 2 X4 620 2.6GHz Socket AM3 et l'estimation moyenne est 86%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour AMD Athlon 2 X4 620 2.6GHz Socket AM3.
September 2009
(86%)
89 Avis
Note moyenne issue des avis d’experts sur ce produit.
Utilisateurs
-
0 Avis
Note moyenne délivrée par les utilisateurs du produit.
We really find it difficult to recommend the Athlon II X4 to anyone because it has very few redeeming features. Its very high power use for the minimal transistor count is strange and confusing: why is there the need to throw at hefty 1.4V through the ...
Extrait: This makes it a good deal cheaper than the Intel Core 2 Q8200 that you won’t find for under $140 but which gives a similar level of performance! The AMD offer is by far the best here then. Of course in some rare cases..
Cet avis était-il utile?
-
Publié: 2009-10-19, Auteur: Brian , review by: icrontic.com
Do we need processors that cost over $500 nowadays? To be perfectly honest, most people don’t. The most demanding task average consumers can throw at a computer is A/V content: They have 1080p AVC-HD video cameras, they have webcams, they have simple ...
Cheap, Stable performance, 95W , low power consumer
Overclocking
This is a pretty decent CPU, for 90$ you get alot of performance especially if you overclock the CPU a little bit. It performs better than 905e in stock performance and cost almost half the price. This CPU should do well in HTPC setups and even in nor...
Before getting into our overall conclusions, I must give kudos to AMD for being the first company out the door with a sub-$100 quad-core processor. Any way you look at it, reaching this point is impressive, because once again, quad-cores haven't even ...
In most scenarios Athlon II X4 620 was faster than an Intel-based system on the same price range (Pentium E6300). The only important exception was on Photoshop CS4, where Pentium E6300 was 24% faster than Athlon II X4 620, and file compression with Wi...
Great pricing, Good performance, Low power consumption and heat, Good overclocking and great underclocking potential, Same list of technology support as Phenoms, Socket AM2/DDR2 compatibility
Lower gaming performance, Not the best choice for die hard overclockers, High stock voltage
Even if AMD is not leading the market in terms of pure brute performance, it still finds categories where it can brand the product with "world's first". This time, it's the world's first and still only quad-core processor with a price under $1...
Extrait: As most enthusiasts can tell you, the Intel Core i7 lineup is a formidable powerhouse of processors. But you will likely also hear in the next breath that they are very expensive. Both statements are true, and I doubt many people can argue those facts....
The competition is relatively peachy for the new processor. We assumed that it will be slower than the Q8200 and that it would compete with Q7x models. But in fact these processors are on a par. Moreover, its a cheaper model, so the 630 and higher pr...
