Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 76 examens experts du AMD A8-7600 65W 3.3GHz Socket FM2+ et l'estimation moyenne est 76%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour AMD A8-7600 65W 3.3GHz Socket FM2+.
February 2014
(76%)
76 Avis
Note moyenne issue des avis d’experts sur ce produit.
Utilisateurs
(60%)
1 Avis
Note moyenne délivrée par les utilisateurs du produit.
76010076
Les éditeurs ont aimé
Consommation électrique au repos
Accélération GPU pour les applications compatibles
Les éditeurs n'ont pas aimé
Performances CPU en retrait de celles de la concurrence
The Kaveri A8-7600 with Radeon R7 on-die graphics is supposed to offer an attractive all-in-one solution for mainstream users. At $119 it is relatively affordable and it makes a lot of sense for casual gamers or home users. Sadly though, the A8-7600 is st...
Much better integrated-graphics performance than comparable Intel chips, CPU performance similar to that of previous-generation A10, while sipping a third less power
Comparably priced Intel Core i3 is faster in most typical CPU workloads, Fast RAM required for best gaming performance, HSA support currently limited
This midrange CPU/GPU delivers very good integrated graphics performance, and improved CPU performance, at a more reasonable price and power level than its A10-7850K "Kaveri" counterpart. It’s a good choice for budget gaming PCs, though comparable In...
Kaveri is another incremental improvement to AMD's mainstream desktop lineup. Efficiency is the watchword, both in terms of CPU clock cycles and power consumption. The A8-7600, despite having a modest clock speed of 3.1 or 3.3 GHz (depend on the TDP s...
Subjective impressions and conclusions As I said on the previous page, Battlefield 4's Mantle renderer is kind of a double-edged sword. That's true on Kaveri much as it is on the high-end, R9 290X-powerd system that Scott tested. The renderer's effect, in...
As the benchmarks have shown, AMD are still way off when it comes to CPU specific tasks. However, Kaveri was never really meant to compete with Intel's i5 or i7 processors and was aimed more at the casual gamer. In terms of gaming performance, Kaveri sho...
Cet avis était-il utile?
(78%)
Publié: 2014-01-23, Auteur: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Kaveri's efficiency gains make it a wise choice over Richland while AMD's powerful integrated graphics and affordable pricing are enough to counter Intel's faster CPUs.
Relatively weak speed gains overall with a 10% clockforclock performance bump over Richland, while the older part actually came out on top more than we expected.
Publié: 2014-01-21, Auteur: Joel , review by: pcmag.com
Best-in-class GPU performance. Much-improved CPU performance. Future support for HSA applications and the Mantle graphics API should further improve performance.
Performance still lags far behind that of Intel chips
The new AMD A8-7600 offers best-in-class GPU performance and much-improved CPU performance in the 45W power envelope. Future support for HSA applications and the Mantle graphics API should further improve the chip's performance....
Extrait: We've spent the days following CES benchmarking two of AMD's new Kaveri-based APUs. Do the Steamroller x86 architecture, GCN graphics design, and HSA-oriented features impress, or do they come up short against Intel's value-oriented Haswell-based parts? ...
AMD's new Kaveri APU is an impressive feat of engineering, coming in as the very first truly HSA-compatible processor. There are a lot of changes for AMD with this release including a new processor core, a new memory hierarchy, as well as a new process t...
Publié: 2014-01-14, Auteur: Ian , review by: anandtech.com
In a vacuum where all that's available are other AMD parts, Kaveri and its Steamroller cores actually look pretty good. At identical frequencies there's a healthy increase in IPC, and AMD has worked very hard to move its Bulldozer family down to a substan...
