fr.testseek.com  

 
 
Rechercher:   
 

Accueil » Ordinateurs » CPU » AMD » AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4



Travail en cours
Patientez SVP...

  Avis experts    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 348 examens experts du AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4 et l'estimation moyenne est 88%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice April 2017
April 2017
 
(88%)
348 Avis
Utilisateurs
-
0 Avis
88 0 100 348

Les éditeurs ont aimé

  • Grosses nouveautés architecturales côté rouge
  • Ecrase la concurrence en archivage et création 3D
  • Rapport Perf/prix en applicatif EXTREMEMENT intéressant
  • Soudure en indium températures polaires
  • Ecrase les Quad Core Intel en streaming
  • Ressenti très f
  • Performances en rendu 3D
  • Performances en encodage vidéo
  • Performances élevées dans l'absolu

Les éditeurs n'ont pas aimé

  • …Mais pas aussi bon que le Ryzen 7 1700
  • Absence d'iGPU
  • On aurait préféré un Wraith Spire
  • Performances en retrait dans certains jeux
  • Variabilité pas exceptionnelle dans certains cas @Stock
  • Un bon cran endessous des Ryzen 7 en streaming
  • Performances dans les jeux
  • Performances légèrement en retrait lorsque le système mémoire est mis à rude contribution

Show Show

 

Avis

page 7 de 35
Classer par:
Note
 
  Publié: 2017-04-11, Auteur: ATMINSIDE , review by: overclockers.com

  • Well, the performance is pleasantly surprising. The 1500X, in most cases, performed on par with the i7-7700K. Even though you can overclock the i7 further, the MSRP of the Ryzen 5 1500X is only $189. That's a monstrous difference in price/performance. E...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2017-04-11, Auteur: Bruno , review by: reviewstudio.net

  • performance, overclocking, power consumption, value
  • AMD Ryzen 7 produced a revolution in the 8-core area, offering at least the same performance as Intel LGA2011 counterparts, but at half price. Now Ryzen 5 came to compete with LGA1151 solutions, and AMD banged Intel's head again with 1600X, a 6-core/12-th...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(95%)
 
  Publié: 2017-04-11, Auteur: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Exceptional value compared to their Intel Core i5 counterparts. Ryzen holds a clear lead in productivity performance, though gaming performance is more evenly matched between Intel and AMD
  • Power efficiency goes right out the window once you start overclocking
  • Using AMD's stock coolers, the standard 1500X idled at 35 degrees and peaked at 68 degrees using the Wraith Spire. When overclocked to 3.95GHz, however, its temperatures increased to 42 degrees at idle and 88 degrees under load. That said, the heatsink wa...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2017-04-11, Auteur: Ron , review by: modders-inc.com

  • Extrait:  The sub-$250 CPU price point is the sweet spot where most system builders look at for their next CPU choice. In this area, creators, gamers and casual system builders intersect and overlap with their computing needs. Intel's 4-core/4-threaded i5 processor...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2017-04-11, Auteur: garfi3ld , review by: lanoc.org

  • Well, the Ryzen 7 launch has a surprising amount of excitement and drama mixed together with the impressive numbers but with memory issues and game performance causing very polarized opinions on social media and on websites like Reddit. AMD fans even...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2017-04-11, Auteur: Tom , review by: overclock3d.net

  • Extrait:  Since the launch of the FX8 series of processors AMD have fallen into the sector of the market that is best described by the old "good value for money" adage, which is usually a pejorative way of saying that the performance wasn't all that but they're che...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Publié: 2017-04-11, Auteur: Steve , review by: gamersnexus.net

  • Extrait:  Following our in-depth Ryzen VR benchmark (R7 1700 vs. i7-7700K with the Rift + Vive), we immediately began compiling results for the concurrent R5 test efforts by GN Sr. Editor Patrick Lathan. Working together, we were able to knock-out the VR benchmarks...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2017-03-22, Auteur: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • For such a small six-game sample, those benchmarks showed quite a few interesting results. Perhaps the most exciting conclusion we can draw is that upcoming six-core Ryzen processors should perform roughly on par with eight-core models when playing today'...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2018-05-05, Auteur: Phil , review by: pctechreviews.com.au

  • Solid Multi-Core performance, 1600X is close to 1700 in performance, Both are suitable for gaming, 1600X is also a good option for content creation, New AM4 platform, wide range of motherboards available, Great Value for money at the current prices, Good
  • Overclocking with the Wraith coolers was limited
  • Ryzen 5 exceeded my expectations and the 6 core/12 thread 1600X presents a real dilemma for enthusiast gamers given how closely it performs to the Ryzen 7 1700. The 1600X will almost certainly fill the requirements of an enthusiast who games 70% of the ti...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2017-04-18, review by: tweaktown.com

  • The Ryzen 5 CPUs are pretty much what we expected; slight enhancements in software/microcode with similar multi-core performance that scales with core count and frequency compared to Ryzen 7. At similar price points to Intel's offerings, the multi-threade...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
  Award


(92%)
    page 7 de 35 « Précédent   1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 35   Suivant »  
 
Autres produits populaires de la même catégorie