Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 348 examens experts du AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4 et l'estimation moyenne est 88%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4.
April 2017
(88%)
348 Avis
Note moyenne issue des avis d’experts sur ce produit.
Utilisateurs
-
0 Avis
Note moyenne délivrée par les utilisateurs du produit.
880100348
Les éditeurs ont aimé
Grosses nouveautés architecturales côté rouge
Ecrase la concurrence en archivage et création 3D
Rapport Perf/prix en applicatif EXTREMEMENT intéressant
Soudure en indium températures polaires
Ecrase les Quad Core Intel en streaming
Ressenti très f
Performances en rendu 3D
Performances en encodage vidéo
Performances élevées dans l'absolu
Les éditeurs n'ont pas aimé
…Mais pas aussi bon que le Ryzen 7 1700
Absence d'iGPU
On aurait préféré un Wraith Spire
Performances en retrait dans certains jeux
Variabilité pas exceptionnelle dans certains cas @Stock
Un bon cran endessous des Ryzen 7 en streaming
Performances dans les jeux
Performances légèrement en retrait lorsque le système mémoire est mis à rude contribution
Which processor now offers the most bang of your buck varies per price segment. If you have a very small budget, in our opinion it is best to find an Intel Pentium G4560, which, given its higher availability, is less of a challenge than it was a few month...
Which processor now offers the most bang of your buck varies per price segment. If you have a very small budget, in our opinion it is best to find an Intel Pentium G4560, which, given its higher availability, is less of a challenge than it was a few month...
Cet avis était-il utile?
Award
-
Publié: 2017-12-05, Auteur: Richard , review by: eurogamer.net
There are now two great gaming CPU lines available for the core gamer. The overwhelming weight of the data points to Ryzen 5 as the best buy in this market segment, specifically the non-X 1600 model. It's especially compelling against the only two locked...
AMD Ryzen 5 vs. Intel Core i5 in games: the conclusionWhich CPU is the best choice for gaming?By Tomas Hochstenbach Wednesday 9 August 2017 07:13IntroductionEver since the launch of Ryzen the gaming performance of AMD's new processors has...
Cet avis était-il utile?
Award
-
Publié: 2017-08-07, Auteur: Richard , review by: eurogamer.net
There are now two great gaming CPU lines available for the core gamer. The overwhelming weight of the data points to Ryzen 5 as the best buy in this market segment, specifically the non-X 1600 model. It's especially compelling against the only two locked...
Publié: 2017-05-07, Auteur: Dave , review by: pcgamesn.com
Put simply the Ryzen 5 1600X is a far more significant processor than any of the octa-core Ryzen 7 CPUs, and for us gamers arguably the most significant chip AMD have ever made.This is where AMD have got a far more balanced competitor for Intel's chips, m...
Publié: 2017-05-03, Auteur: Andrew , review by: techteamgb.co.uk
Extrait: Stock speeds for CPU + 2933MHz @1.4V DRAM @15-15-15-36Overclocked to 4GHz @ 1.425V (1.1V SOC) + 2933MHz @1.4V DRAM @15-15-15-36Can the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X defeat the Intel i5 7600K? I think so. This budget 6 core CPU is a real game changer for those low bud...
Although a little more expensive than the i5-7600K, it's easy to see that the Ryzen 5 1600X is better value for demanding tasks such as 3D- and video rendering, video editing and compressing and decompressing files. The Intel chip still has an advantage f...
The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X isn't a just an affordable chip for gamers and media creators, it an incredible package that puts multi-core computing on the mainstream map...
Publié: 2017-04-12, Auteur: Luke , review by: kitguru.net
Superb multi-threaded computational performance that obliterates the Core i5-7600K, Multi-threaded performance makes the i7-7700K and i7-6800K look like poor value for money, Plenty of spare computational capacity for game streamers, Power consumption num
Gaming performance is not as strong as Intel's competition, which is disappointing for this market segment, Kaby Lake competition has significantly better single-threaded performance, Maximum frequency achievable is limited, especially compared to Intel's
With Ryzen 5, AMD builds upon the foundations set by the flagship 8C16T Ryzen 7 processors, and that's generally a good thing.Performance in multi-threaded workloads is in a different league to Intel's price-comparable competitor processors. Ryzen 5 happi...
