Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 162 examens experts du AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe et l'estimation moyenne est 82%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe.
September 2015
(82%)
162 Avis
Note moyenne issue des avis d’experts sur ce produit.
Utilisateurs
-
0 Avis
Note moyenne délivrée par les utilisateurs du produit.
Despite the small amount of benchmarks, it looks like AMD deserves some serious props for even creating the Radeon R9 Nano.This pint-sized powerhouse is based on revolutionarily tiny - and fast - high-bandwidth memory to deliver flagship-level performance...
Extrait: And it's easy to explain why: a quick look at the Fiji block diagram illustrates the chip's four shader engines, similar to Hawaii's configuration. Each has its own geometry processor and rasterizer, as well as four render back ends that can process up to...
The Nano is an impressive product, to see something perform so well at a form factor of 15cm is impressive. That said it isn't perfect with the HDMI 2.0 limitation and airflow dependency relative to noise. But if you get airflow under control in a clos...
Exceptionally powerful for a 6-inch, air-cooled card, Easily outperforms any similarly sized Nvidia card currently available
Radeon R9 Fury X and GeForce GTX 980 Ti perform better overall for about the same price, Lack of HDMI 2.0 support makes the card a tricky fit for gaming on a 4K HDTV
The R9 Nano is stunningly powerful given its Mini-ITX-friendly form factor, and a true leap ahead for AMD. Just know that this is a specialized component meant for very tight, compact PCs, and that you're paying a major premium for that fact. Read More…...
Cet avis était-il utile?
Award
(80%)
Publié: 2015-09-10, Auteur: Marco , review by: hothardware.com
Good Performance, Tiny Form Factor, Cool and Quiet, Power Efficient (Relatively Speaking)
Not Quite As Fast As A Fury, Premium Pricing, Inductor Noise, No HDMI 2.0
AMD Radeon R9 Nano - Find It At AmazonAMD seems to have hit all the cues it set out to with the Radeon R9 Nano. This card is ridiculously tiny in light of other high-end GPUs, its power consumption characteristics are significantly more manageable than ot...
Publié: 2015-09-10, Auteur: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Measuring a mere 6" long, the R9 Nano brings 4K gaming performance to cases where the Fury X can't fit and it exceeds the GTX 980 Ti in efficiency.
For the same $650, the GTX 980 Ti and R9 Fury X are a bit faster. Coil noise is an issue on our sample and on high the fan isn't particularly quiet either. It is 2015 where is the HDMI 2.0 support?
performance, small form factor, power consumption, dead silent
price
AMD R9 Nano is a down-clocked Fury X with a lower TDP and air-cooled. All those differences from the big brother make it smaller and oriented towards HTPCs and mini-ITX systems. It's the same Fiji GPU, running 50MH less than X, but if you overclock it to...
Extrait: The AMD Radeon R9 Fury X and Fury video cards got the attention of the gaming community when they were released in June 2015 as the new Fiji GPU and High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) was very intriguing to the community. It was tough to find any Fury cards in-s...
We are uncertain, and a bit confused, for the second paper launch when the actual video card launch is only two weeks away. Why not sample cards and let the card speak for itself at launch? Perhaps part of the issue is the fact that this is a video card...
