Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 344 examens experts du AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe et l'estimation moyenne est 85%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe.
June 2015
(85%)
344 Avis
Note moyenne issue des avis d’experts sur ce produit.
Utilisateurs
-
0 Avis
Note moyenne délivrée par les utilisateurs du produit.
Unfortunately we are bringing you our Radeon R9 Fury X review a week late. AMD had limited samples ready for the release and only one card was allocated for Australian media. AMD was willing to help us out by buying a Fury X locally for us to test, so a b...
Cet avis était-il utile?
-
Publié: 2015-07-02, Auteur: Ryan , review by: anandtech.com
Bringing this review to a close, AMD has certainly thrown a great deal at us with the Radeon R9 Fury X. After the company's stumble with their last single-GPU flagship, the Radeon R9 290X, they have reevaluated what they want to do, how they want to build...
Publié: 2015-07-01, Auteur: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Performance is competitive with the GTX 980 Ti and AMD's HBM allows for a compact design that runs exceptionally cool and quiet with the bundled liquid cooler.
Being out of stock online might be the Fury X's biggest obstacle, though the GTX 980 Ti is a better value in raw price vs. performance, especially if you overclock.
Unfortunately we are bringing you our Radeon R9 Fury X review a week late. AMD had limited samples ready for the release and only one card was allocated for Australian media. AMD was willing to help us out by buying a Fury X locally for us to test, so a b...
The AMD Radeon R9 Fury X was one of the most hyped up desktop graphics cards as it is the first consumer graphics card to ship with High-Bandwidth Memory on it. AMD was the first company to ship products using GDDR5 memory back in 2007 with the introducti...
Publié: 2015-06-24, Auteur: Ryan , review by: pcper.com
In a world where a couple of percentage points of performance one way or the other can make or break a product launch, it's easy to forget how much of these types of purchases are based on preference. If you asked me today which card is faster, the AMD Fu...
Cet avis était-il utile?
Award
-
Publié: 2015-06-24, Auteur: Scott , review by: Techreport.com
As usual, we'll sum up our test results with a couple of value scatter plots. The best values tend toward the upper left corner of each plot, where performance is highest and prices are lowest. We've converted our 99th-percentile frame time results into...
Cet avis était-il utile?
-
Publié: 2015-06-24, Auteur: Tom , review by: overclock3d.net
Wow. There is life in the old dog yet.AMD had spent so long languishing behind nVidia that people were starting to speculate about their demise. The HD5870 was probably the last card that was a genuine challenger. The R9 290X got close but the Ti variant...
Extrait: The AMD R9 Fury X is not the 4K champion, 980 Ti killer AMD would like it to be. Based on my time testing this new graphics card with high bandwidth memory, it's fast— sometimes neck-and-neck with Nvidia's equally priced 980 Ti—but not quite fast enough...
Compact for a high-end card geared toward 4K gaming output, Runs quiet and cool, thanks to bundled radiator and fan, Roughly matches Nvidia's GeForce GTX 980 Ti at 4K and high settings
Overall performance slides in just behind Nvidia's competing card, especially at lower resolutions, Radiator complicates installation, takes up space gained by smaller card, Lack of HDMI 2.0 port makes card an iffy choice for gaming on a 4K HDTV
With the help of a new type of memory, AMD's liquid-cooled Fury X delivers performance that nearly matches Nvidia's GeForce GTX 980 Ti in a compact, quiet form factor. Just know you'll need to mount a small radiator, and think twice if you intend to use...
