fr.testseek.com  

 
 
Rechercher:   
 

Accueil » Ordinateurs » Cartes graphiques » PCI-Express » AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe



Travail en cours
Patientez SVP...

  Avis experts    

Reviews of AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe

Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 344 examens experts du AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe et l'estimation moyenne est 85%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe.
Award: Editor’s Choice June 2015
June 2015
 
(85%)
344 Avis
Utilisateurs
-
0 Avis
85 0 100 344

Les éditeurs ont aimé

  • Mémoire HBM
  • Performances en 4K
  • Design de la carte
  • Performances dans les jeux
  • Ventilation discrète
  • Consommation maîtrisée

Les éditeurs n'ont pas aimé

  • Seulement 4 Go de mémoire
  • Encore des progrès en consommation
  • Pas de HDMI 2.0
  • Solution de watercooling peu pratique
  • Sifflement de la pompe
  • Overclocking très limité
  • HDMI 1.4 uniquement

Show Show

 

Avis

page 3 de 35
Classer par:
Note
 
  Publié: 2015-07-12, Auteur: Richard , review by: eurogamer.net

  • If you're looking for the cheapest single-chip GPU that can run a good proportion of games well at 4K resolution, the Radeon R9 Fury is a quality purchase. It's not far off the pace set by its bigger brother and it can be overclocked to match in most titl...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2015-07-03, Auteur: Allan , review by: kitguru.net

  • runs cool under load, super quiet fan, physically small, ideal for specific system builds, HBM is likely the future of GPU design, AMD's greatest single GPU card yet, strong 4K performance
  • pump noise, radiator takes up more space in case, coil whine is intrusive, minimal overclocking potential at this stage, the GTX980Ti is still the faster board, struggles to compete at 1440p, No HDMI 2.0 support.
  • The R9 Fury X 4GB is a positive move forward for AMD as it indicates the potential they have to produce small, powerful graphics cards – able to fit inside very small cases and system builds. HBM certainly seems to be tightly engrained into the future of...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
  Award


(75%)
 
  Publié: 2015-07-02, review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Extrait:  AMD introduced her new R7/R9 300 range of graphics cards on the 18th of June. We benchmarked the Radeon R7 370 2GB and 4GB, 380 2GB and 4GB as well as the Radeon R9 390 and 390X. We will not dive in to technical aspects and possibilities of the new ca...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2015-07-01, Auteur: Rikki , review by: eteknix.com

  • Outstanding performance, Silent operation at low load levels, Almost 100% scaling in several tests, 4GB is definitely not a limiting factor,
  • Drivers proved problematic in some games, Early adopter premium, “This crossfire set-up isn’t for those with a small budget or small case or small power supply, but it is a seriously good option is you want to go 4K and take on a brand new technology with
  • PriceDue to the extremely limited availability of the graphics card, prices are set to fluctuate massively in the coming weeks. Currently you can pre-order an XFX model from Scan.co.uk for £546.62, however, in stock prices are as high as £649.99. In the U...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Publié: 2015-06-25, Auteur: Richard , review by: eurogamer.net

  • There have been some excellent deep dives on the make-up of the Fiji processor at the heart of the Radeon R9 Fury X - one of the best we've seen comes from The Tech Report, breaking down performance from individual components of the GPU and analysing thei...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2015-06-24, Auteur: Tarinder , review by: HEXUS.net

  • AMD back in the big league, Competitively priced, Runs cool under load, Very quiet, Innovative HBM memory, Looks the business
  • Not quite as fast as GTX 980 Ti, 4GB may prove a hurdle at 4K, No overclocking on memory, No HDMI 2.0
  • AMD and Nvidia have taken contrasting approaches for designing premium graphics cards in mid-2015. Hampered by the problems associated with 20nm manufacturing, which was supposed to be prevalent by now, both companies have had to rework architectures for...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Publié: 2015-06-24, Auteur: Stuart , review by: hardwareheaven.com

  • If retailers stick to the £509 price point, or even manage to hit £499 then the Fury X offers a competitive alternative to the GTX 980 Ti. The competition does offer some higher framerates but the Fury X is more than just raw numbers… its a really lovely...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Publié: 2015-06-24, review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Extrait:  Last week AMD introduced the complete new line up of the Radeon R7/R9 300-series. However, all these new models are based on existing technology and GPUs. Today AMD is presenting their newest top end model based on a completely new chip. In our review w...

 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2015-06-24, Auteur: Chris , review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • AMD's fans wanted to see an ultra-high-end powerhouse capable of creaming GeForce GTX 980 Ti. Its detractors assumed a series of delays meant it'd be too hot and slow. In reality, neither group can claim clairvoyance.Instead, the Radeon R9 Fury X delivers...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
-
 
  Publié: 2015-06-24, review by: Digitaltrends.com

  • Compact, attractive, Stock liquid cooling, Competitive performance-per-watt
  • Liquid cooler's radiator is unwieldy, Doesn't beat the GTX 980 Ti
  • So, here's the moment of truth. Should you buy the Radeon R9 Fury X instead of the GTX 980 Ti? Probably not. The Fury X is an impressive card. Were it alone in its bracket, or priced slightly differently, it'd be easy to recommend. At $649, though, it...

Lire l’avis en entier »
 
Cet avis était-il utile?   
 
(70%)
    page 3 de 35 « Précédent   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 35   Suivant »  
 
Autres produits populaires de la même catégorie