Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 509 examens experts du AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB HBM2 PCIe et l'estimation moyenne est 79%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB HBM2 PCIe.
August 2017
(79%)
509 Avis
Note moyenne issue des avis d’experts sur ce produit.
Utilisateurs
-
0 Avis
Note moyenne délivrée par les utilisateurs du produit.
790100509
Les éditeurs ont aimé
Performances dans les jeux élevées dans l'absolu
Permet le jeu en définition supérieure (type WQHD) avec un écran FreeSync
Les éditeurs n'ont pas aimé
Consommation électrique qui explose
Nuisances sonores
Avis
page 6 de 51
Classer par:
Note
Publié: 2017-09-18, Auteur: Dr. , review by: techarp.com
Ever since we saw AMD Vega running DOOM, we had such high hopes for it. The success of the AMD Ryzen family of processors only buoyed that optimism. However, the AMD Vega turned out not to be the Pascal-killer we thought it would be.On paper, the AMD Rade...
Unlike the RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooled edition which fell quite short of its performance target of the GTX 1080 Ti and barely matched the GTX 1080, the RX Vega 56 is faster than the GTX 1070 FE. Using performance as our primary metric, at $399, the RX Vega 5...
Publié: 2017-08-31, Auteur: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Well I have to say that although I haven't had a chance to check out the multiplayer action yet, I was pleasantly surprised with what I found in the beta experience of Destiny 2. The game looks great, plays well and it's already significantly more polishe...
Faster than GeForce GTX 1070 FE, ~30% lower power than Vega 64, Great 1440p performance
Higher power consumption than GTX 1070, Cooling fan is loud under load, Uncertain value given volatile pricing
Radeon RX Vega 56 has the potential to be a GeForce GTX 1070 killer if AMD can make enough of them to hit its pricing target. Although the card uses a lot of power, kicks out quite a bit of heat, and makes more noise than the competition under load, p...
Publié: 2017-08-25, Auteur: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Vega 64 is slightly slower than the GTX 1080, while the liquid cooled version wins more than it loses against the GTX 1080
Poor availability and thus pricing. AMD's aircooled RX Vega 64 reference card is ~5% slower than the GTX 1080 FE despite being hotter, louder and using more power (though we have high hopes for custom cards)
After gaming with the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 we are left with a better feeling compared to AMD Radeon RX Vega 64. We are not left wanting. Performance is good at default, providing better performance and gameplay experience compared to Founders Edition GeF...
Cet avis était-il utile?
Award
-
Publié: 2017-08-22, Auteur: Tom , review by: overclock3d.net
Given the slightly underhanded way in which AMD launched the Vega at one price point so that the launch reviews were written under the misapprehension that the card was £449 when it's actually £549, we won't do our usual thing of not really taking the pri...
Publié: 2017-08-21, Auteur: Ryan , review by: anandtech.com
Bringing this review to a close, if it feels like Vega has been a long time coming, it's not just your imagination. AMD first unveiled the Vega name 17 months ago, and it was 7 months ago when we got our first peek into the Vega architecture. So today's l...
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and the GeForce GTX 1070 is supposedly the sweet spot for three Vega cards released by AMD thus far. AMD is banking that the Vega 56 will be the high-performance card to buy at the $399 price point once it starts shipping on Augu...
