Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 199 examens experts du Battlefield 5 et l'estimation moyenne est 79%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour Battlefield 5.
May 2019
(79%)
199 Avis
Note moyenne issue des avis d’experts sur ce produit.
Utilisateurs
(78%)
20 Avis
Note moyenne délivrée par les utilisateurs du produit.
790100199
Les éditeurs ont aimé
Visuellement splendide
Un travail sur le son très impressionnant
La scénarisation des parties multijoueur
Le système de construction
Les mini-campagnes sympathiques et bien écrites...
Visuellement impeccable
Énorme travail de sound-design
Le feeling des armes
La synergie des classes
Le rythme des parties
La victoire qui doit se grignoter mètre par mètre
Le solo correct
Une bande-son subtile
Une spécialisation qui offre beaucoup
Retour aux sources maîtrisé
Que c'est beau
Et bien optimisé
Toujours ce sound design exceptionnel
Efficacité de la mise en scène
Terriblement immersif
Le redoutable système d'escouade
Le jeu de destruction/fortification
Level design rôdé
Fi
Visuellement bluffant
Les Grandes Opérations
Ultra intense
La coopération au cœur du gameplay
Le système de progression
Intéressant et sans microtransactions
Combats toujours aussi haletants et dynamiques
Un Battlefield à la Seconde Guerre Mondiale
ça ne se refuse pas
Sound design ciselé
Des cartes travaillées aux environnements variés
Le retour du mode Ligne de Front
Construction de fortifications
Les éditeurs n'ont pas aimé
Mais bien trop courtes
L'intérêt des véhicules en retrait
Il manque de contenu à la sortie
La customisation cosmétique pas très inspirée
Certaines parties qui tirent parfois vraiment trop en longueur
Déjà peuplé de malades de la gâchette partout
L'impression d'acheter un jeu qui n'est pas terminé toujours étrange
Peu de véhicules différents
Un peu short sur le contenu à la sortie
Quelques soucis d'équilibrage
Le solo se plie bien vite
Les Récits de Guerre assez oubliables
Un contenu un poil juste
Seulement 8 cartes
Quelques soucis sur les serveurs
Quelques bugs – en particulier les murs invisibles bien relous (mais relativement rares)
Peu de réelles nouveautés dans les modes de jeu
Quel intérêt au cosmétique des soldats en l'état actuel ?
Le mode Percée manque d'intérêt en dehors des Grandes
Publié: 2018-11-28, Auteur: Jeremy , review by: Gamingnexus.com
Extrait: The Battlefield franchise seems to be in the midst of an identity crisis. Over the past couple of years (and entries), the series has hopped around all over the place. We've done futuristic war, revisited World War I, and even ventured to the world of loc...
Battlefield V offers incredible pace as it sidesteps into the hardcore realm with modest success. Maps are open and satisfactory for Conquest, albeit with design issues, and some modes are too linear and chaotic. These inconsistencies, along with numerous...
Publié: 2018-11-24, Auteur: Kai , review by: wccftech.com
Satisfying gunfights at short, medium, or long range, Customization for guns is the deepest it's been yet (including mastery challenges to unlock new camo parts for weapons), Medic class is still (too bad it's limited to just SMGs for its primary)
Very brief singleplayer campaigns, Character animations feel out of place and can lead to some frustrating glitches, Many cosmetics are simply palette swaps, No Battle Royale mode until March
As one of the best looking FPS on the market, nothing else can compete with the destruction and visual assault of Battlefield V. However, this great war stands incomplete with many features not yet available at launch...
Potential to be the best entry in the franchise, Beautiful graphics and RTX is a great bonus, Squad-focused gameplay is fun and
The games feels incomplete and needs a lot of patches, RTX halves performance in most cases and is not optimized, Bugs and more bugs need to be ironed out...
Publié: 2018-11-21, Auteur: James , review by: ign.com
Like a fresh recruit, Battlefield V was clearly deployed into action without adequate preparation. And a variety of bugs, underdeveloped features, and placeholder menu screens remind you of that at nearly every turn. However, there's a great deal of raw p...
Looks fantastic, especially the snow levels, Expansions are free, for the first time in almost a decade, Multiplayer "construction" tool adds new tactics
War Stories rely too much on stealth and lack emotional depth, Some multiplayer maps lack focus, Character customization feels tonally off-kilter
Anyway, it's Battlefield, and a pretty decent one at that. It's certainly not as interesting as its predecessor, but if you wanted Battlefield to return to its World War II roots then it's done that at long last. There's no Midway this time, no Omaha Beac...
Publié: 2018-11-20, Auteur: Michael , review by: gamespot.com
Grand Operations brings out the best in Battlefield, Frontlines and Breakthrough are focused, thrilling modes, Impressive visual and audio experience that elevates the better moments, Smooth movement and impactful gunplay come together seamlessly, Small t
Most maps feel too congested or disjointed for Conquest mode, War Stories is inconsistent in style and tone, A number of small bugs accumulate to show rough spots, Vehicle progression seems a bit too demanding
Extrait: When it comes to Battlefield games, many things come to mind. For me at least, I think massive open maps, incredibly realistic sound design, large scale destruction and meaningful story lines. While Battlefield V manages to hit all of those key notes for...
Extrait: Nvidia announced its Turing architecture and its halo feature of real-time ray tracing hardware acceleration in August and it sounded promising, but there was one major concern: When would we actually see games that could utilize the new features? We were...
