Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 369 examens experts du Motorola Moto 360 et l'estimation moyenne est 72%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour Motorola Moto 360.
(72%)
369 Avis
Note moyenne issue des avis d’experts sur ce produit.
Utilisateurs
(87%)
111 Avis
Note moyenne délivrée par les utilisateurs du produit.
720100369
Les éditeurs ont aimé
Des matériaux nobles
Étanchéité à l'eau et à la poussière
Compatible avec de nombreux appareils Android
Bracelet ajustable
Luminosité de l'écran
Recharge par induction
Design audacieux et élégant
Interface Android Wear agréable
Légereté
Matériaux (métal
Verre
Cuir. )
Design circulaire et conception métallique
Chargement sans fil
Résistante à l'eau
Capteur de luminosité ambiante et moniteur de fréquence cardiaque
Style sobre
Efficace et unisexe
Belle luminosité maximale de l'écran
Recharge sans fil
Bonne réactivité générale
Personnalisation poussée des cadrans
Design iconique et attrayant
La smartwatch Android Wear la plus confortable
Luminosité automatique
Design et finitions
Charge par induction
Android Wear a des aspects intéressants…
Son look
Design très séduisant
Ecran rond
Bracelets interchangeables
Design Chargement sans fil Bracelets standard
Un design remarquable
De super finitions
Rechargement sans fil
Les watch faces de Motorola
Qualité de finition
Design
Grand écran lisible
Moniteur de fréquence cardiaque
Recharge ultra rapide
Design rond
Finition
Qualité des matériaux
Confort
Recharge par induction.
Enfin une smartwatch qui ressemble à une vraie montre
Ecran de qualité
Via un socle
Les ajouts logiciels de Motorola
Certifiée IP67
Les éditeurs n'ont pas aimé
Châssis un peu encombrant
Manque de fiabilité des capteurs
Comportement parfois étrange
Détection de la diction perfectible
Le choix d'un affichage circulaire rend des images parfois coupées
Recharge quotidienne indispensable
Bas de l'écran circulaire raboté
Gestion des notifications trop limitée
Très épaisse
Batterie limitée (moins de 24 heures)
Ralentissements et bugs
Bracelet qui s'use facilement
Pas de connectivité WiFi ni NFC
Autonomie largement perfectible / Quelques ratés avec le micro
Quelques défauts de finition sur le boîtier / Barre noire qui gâche un peu la rondeur de la dalle
Pourtour de l'écran au biseautage peu heureux
Des approximations logicielles dues en grande
Nécessite une recharge au moins une fois par jour
Quelques bugs du système décevants
Toutes les applis ne sont pas adaptées au format circulaire
A heart rate sensor, NFC for Google Pay, Wi-Fi, and everything else you would expect from a Wear OS watch is here, The 1GB of RAM makes this one of the smoothest Wear OS watches on the market right now
The $350 MSRP is almost laughable when you can buy a Fossil Gen 5 with the same internal hardware for at least $100 less, The recessed dial is harder to use than the dial on most other smartwatches, and there's only one customizable button
Moto 360 (2019)6/10Probably not. The new Moto 360 is a decent product on its own, but it doesn't make much sense to spend $350 on it when you can buy a Fossil Gen 5 for around $250 (it has even dropped as low as $170). Not only does the Fossil Gen 5 have...
One of the reasons that I dug through photos from 2014 to find images of my old Moto 360 is because I wanted to see just how similar these things are, and they're not. Like I said earlier, if you were hoping for the same device but with updated internals...
Reflective display performs great in the sun, Silicone body and strap built for fitness, Integrated GPS for phonefree run tracking
Battery struggles to get through a day, Fitness features underdeveloped, Silicone picks up every piece of lint and hair, Ambient display has no backlighting
Android Wear has always had some pretty basic fitness tracking built in. With a gyroscope in every smartwatch and most Android Wear watches sporting heart rate sensors, they're already capable, if basic, fitness trackers. The addition of GPS and a fitness...
Extrait: While my first inclination was to title this post "what no other smartwatch has", that just wouldn't be accurate. What we've got here is a bona-fide piece of technology in the Moto 360 Sport that's never been released in any device before. Here, according...
Extrait: Smartwatches really only came onto the scene in a major way in the past two years — Google, Apple, and Samsung are all hoping it'll be the next big computing platform. Since then, we've seen lots of manufacturers try different strategies for strapping a c...
Extrait: You know what they say, gang: When it rains, it pours.Just yesterday, I strapped on the new Moto 360 smartwatch, which showed up in the midst of my Moto X Pure Edition review process. And now, what do we have here? Why, it's the other highly anticipated W...
Extrait: It's a tale of two smartwatches. Both round, both running Android Wear. One selling for $349, the other for $180. So which watch is the one for you?We're talking, of course, about the LG Watch Urbane and the Moto 360 -- two of the most buzzed about Androi...
Publié: 2015-04-20, Auteur: Juan , review by: androidguys.com
As I said before, this is by no means supposed to be a detailed review on the Moto 360. Just a short synopsis of my experience with the Moto 360 and some of the changes it has seen since it first came out.While the Moto 360 did not have all of the feature...
Fantastic build quality, Stylish, understated, sleek, Syncs easily with Android, Moto Maker = Customizable, Very useful mobile accessory
Won't work with any other OS other than Android
We're sure many of you are contemplating the need for a smartwatch. I, too, wondered this. I've found myself quite productive using only a smartphone, and I'm a proponent of minimalism. Those who are managing just fine by using just a phone, and aren't ke...
Some might find the "flat tire" a bit weird, but it's not that noticeable. Android Wear needs a bit of work
For a first generation Android Wear device, the Moto 360 performs well and looks decent while on your wrist. As far as the device itself, I couldn't find much wrong with it based on the version of Android Wear it was running. It also functions as intended...
