Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 191 examens experts du Samsung SM-R175 Galaxy Buds Plus et l'estimation moyenne est 82%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour Samsung SM-R175 Galaxy Buds Plus.
February 2020
(82%)
191 Avis
Note moyenne issue des avis d’experts sur ce produit.
Utilisateurs
(87%)
8358 Avis
Note moyenne délivrée par les utilisateurs du produit.
820100191
Les éditeurs ont aimé
Autonomie incroyable
Application désormais compatible iOS
Scène sonore plus large
11 heures d'autonomie
Compatible avec iOS
Très bonne qualité sonore
Excellente autonomie
Format confortable dans les oreilles
Application bien pensée
Un son amélioré grâce à des haut-parleurs dynamiques qui offrent de meilleures performances dans les basses
Publié: 2020-04-14, Auteur: Alex , review by: techaeris.com
Samsung really worked on the sound signature and it shows,Really solid design and build quality,Really good fit and sound isolation,Easy to setup and use,Useful app and software, great sound options,Competitive battery life,Outstanding price point
The black case is a fingerprint magnet and it looks awful when it has fingerprints all over it,I do wish the EQ settings had a custom option
Very long battery life, Good sound quality, Ambient Aware works well, Light and comfortable, Wireless charging case is convenient, Very strong connection and range,
Not great for phone calls, Touch controls aren't comfortable, No high water-resistance rating (only sweat-resistant)
Impressive 11-hour battery life, works wonderfully with Spotify, wireless charging support, decent audio performance, supports iOS,
Looks quite similar to the original Galaxy Buds, more robust water resistance would be welcome, no aptX codec, We say The Samsung Galaxy Buds+ is a significant upgrade over its predecessor, bringing almost double the battery life, enhanced call as well a
As far as endurance is concerned, the Galaxy Buds+ did not disappoint and ran just a few minutes short of the rated 12 hours of listening time before requiring a top-up from the charging case. With 22 hours of rated battery life, it has more than enough e...
Outstanding. Something like 11 hours of playback on a charge, Decidedly good. Not amazing, but improved over the original Galaxy Buds, Touches like wireless charging and in-ear detection are appreciated, $150 — a $20 markup from the standard Galaxy Buds —
Only IPX2 rated. Not safe for use in the rain (or by prolific sweaters), Galaxy Wear doesn't offer enough customization options
Impressive battery life, Much improved audio quality, Compatible with Android and iOS
No advanced codec support, No noise cancellation, Carrying case only has enough for one recharge
The Galaxy Buds+ have quickly become my favorite truly wireless headphones, and I knew it would take a lot to get me away from the Sony WF-1000XM3. Samsung offers stellar battery life, very comfortable earbuds, and some incredible audio. That's a recipe f...
Publié: 2020-02-17, Auteur: Chris , review by: slashgear.com
Audio quality noticeably improved, In-call audio much better, Battery life is excellent, iOS app gives iPhone users more features
Still no active noise cancelation, IPX2 water-resistance rating is low, Touch controls can be finicky
The joys of going wireless continue to convert headphone users to earbuds like the Galaxy Buds+, and for excellent reason. Longer battery life, little in the way of sound quality compromise, and the general convenience of cutting the cord all help explain...
