Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 51 examens experts du Nikon D3X et l'estimation moyenne est 87%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour Nikon D3X.
February 2009
(87%)
51 Avis
Note moyenne issue des avis d’experts sur ce produit.
Utilisateurs
(80%)
15 Avis
Note moyenne délivrée par les utilisateurs du produit.
Its fair to say from our findings that the Nikon D3x is pretty much a re-badged D3 with twice the pixel count but a slower continuous shooting speed; therefore the D3 remains alongside it as a valued component of the range in its own right. Its wort...
Is this excellent camera worth $8,000? We say yes. Why? First, its super-high resolution, which will let you print really big photos. Second, its super-tough build, complete with dust- and weathersealing, as well as an integrated vertical grip, import...
Extrait: Attention Kmart shoppers: all of those pundits who claimed that the megapixel madness was over were wrong. It’s not, and unless I’m woefully mistaken (always a possibility) I don’t think the D-SLR megapixel race is going to end anytime soon, or at lea...
Build and handling, Superb image quality, Ergonomics, Screen size, AF performance, White Balance control, EXPEED image processing and noise control.
No Anti dust system.
The D3x would easily have got a top Best4Reviews rating of six stars – had it not been so pricey. But even so, this is a camera that should be a serious contender for anyone thinking of splashing money on a digital back, which would set you back far ...
The best all-around image quality yet in a studio-oriented digital SLR; fast overall speed from start-up to image capture; rugged, well-balanced camera build; reliable and speedy autofocus system even in low light; accurate exposure system.
Very expensive; noise levels at ISO 3200 not quite as good as Canon 1Ds Mark III; no HD movie mode; shooting buffer is faster than the competition but takes at least 30 seconds to full clear; speeds drop to one frame per second in 14-bit RAW mode.
The Nikon D3X is an expensive camera; theres no two ways around it. And in an era of fiscal belt-tightening, its hard to justify spending $8,000 on a single DSLR when you could get two seemingly comparable cameras with similar resolution for less. A...
At low ISOs clean, artifact-free output with class-leading pixel-level detail, Resolution up with the very best, Efficient D-Lighting preserves extra highlight detail (although the effect is fairly subtle), Good High ISO/noise performance, usable results...
Self-Timer cannot be used in Live-View, Image parameters only offer limited latitude of adjustment, Unreliable Auto White Balance in artificial light, Steep JPEG tone curve can lead to clipped highlights, Slight tendency to overexpose flash images at shor...
When we reviewed the Nikon D3 in April last year we said that it was possibly the most compelling, capable and well-rounded professional digital SLR ever made and that an (at the time non-existent) D3X would have quite a job to do to better the D3...
Incredible resolution, image quality up to ISO 1600, handling and performance
No dust control, no builtin flash, auto WB not foolproof, that price tag!
With the D3x Nikon has finally joined Canon in the exclusive 20 Megapixel Club, and it was worth the wait. The D3x is a stunning camera that pushes the boundaries of DSLR performance to a new level. It isnt perfect, though, in particular, the omissio...
Extrait: Nikon D3x The Worlds Best DSLR,But... I am convinced that by just about any measure (except price) this is the most outstanding 35mm format DSLR yet. Build quality, image quality – you name it. No, its not the fastest shooting, and no it doesnt hav...
Publié: 2006-01-01, Auteur: Michael , review by: imagepower.de
Extrait: The inherent richness of details and tje high resolution are advantages which have to be worked for very hard. This means you have to adopt to a very precise...
