Testseek.fr ont rassemblé 132 examens experts du Fujifilm FinePix X100 et l'estimation moyenne est 82%. Faites descendre l'écran et voyez les toutes les revues pour Fujifilm FinePix X100.
March 2011
(82%)
132 Avis
Note moyenne issue des avis d’experts sur ce produit.
Utilisateurs
(90%)
65 Avis
Note moyenne délivrée par les utilisateurs du produit.
820100132
Les éditeurs ont aimé
Qualité photo
Viseur hybride
Design rétro.
Système de visée hybride optique/électronique réussi
Gestion du bruit électronique remarquable jusqu'à 12800 ISO
Discret (peu de bruit) et mise au point rapide. Mode snapshot possible
Optique fixe lumineuse
Look rétro qui peut plaire
Qualité d'image / plage dynamique
Le must dans les hautes sensibilités
Viseur hybride / ergonomie à l'ancienne
Design / finition / discrétion / latence
Qualité d'image
Réactivité globale en nette hausse
Qualité de construction
Ergonomie "manuelle"
Concept
Viseur exceptionnel
Qualité d’image
Bel objet
Plaisir des sensations photographiques
Discrétion
Viseur optique
Performances photographiques
Les éditeurs n'ont pas aimé
Performance poussive
Navigation
Prix.
Visée optique peu précise
Lenteur au démarrage et à l'enregistrement sur la carte
Passage en macro obligatoire lorsque le sujet est à moins de 80 cm
It's clear that Fujifilm has put a tremendous amount of thought into the Fuji X100 and in many ways it's exactly what many people want: a small-form, large-sensor camera, with a fast optic and all encased in a beautiful and solidly-built body. Whereas ...
Like most photographers who saw the early prototypes of the X100, I couldn’t wait to use it and even considered buying one. Having now spent some time with the camera, it certainly has its charm and has more than proved itself on its image quality. How...
Publié: 2013-04-04, Auteur: Charlie , review by: cultofmac.com
Amazingly wellbuilt, fullmanual controls, fast, gets out of the way, looks great… Everything else
Dodgy RAW conversion support from thirdparties, goes crazy when you snap a picture with the lens cap on, no Leica logo on the front (kidding!)
The Fujifilm X100S Costs $1,200 (I got it for way less by trading in a bunch of old Nikon lenses and an SB900 flash), and is worth every penny. It's the first digital cameras I have used that comes close to being as good as my old Leica M6. No, it's not a...
The X100 is a truly pioneering camera that has brought retro styling back to market in a big way. Though retro styling aside the real beauty of the X100 is that it offers the market a relatively inexpensive rangefinder camera that delivers incredible ...
Beautiful and sturdy build, Excellent hybrid viewfinder, High image quality from sensor and lens,
Very poor multiselector, Confused interface and sluggish performance, Expensive
After patiently waiting so long to get to finally try the Fujifilm X100, we find ourselves walking away just a bit confused. To be clear for the most part, the X100 is a wonderful camera that truly takes lovely photos. There’s no question that short of...
Extrait: Causing more stir than it would seem to deserve, the Fujifilm Finepix X100 may not by itself cause waves in the retail market, but many of its features will surely be taken up by other makers. They just make an awful lot of sense!Snatching the X100 fr...
Prosumer hardware in hipster packaging. Builtin flash, but the blazingfast 35mmequivalent f/2 lens and maximum ISO of 12,800 mean you won't need it much
One lens only. Waterresistant? This camera isn't even rated for use in humidity over 80 percent. Sorry, Florida
Looks great, + Feels great, + Smaller than a full-size digital SLR
More expensive than your ordinary digital camera, - No zoom; can't change lens, - If you want a petite camera, look elsewhere, - No auto-intelligent-preprogrammed-whizbang features, - If you take a lousy picture, you only have yourself to blame
